Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use functions instead of macros for is_in/is_out. #17350

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 17, 2019

Conversation

jaykrell
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@filipnavara filipnavara left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have a pending cleanup that would use is_in/is_out in more places instead of the complicated if conditions.

@jaykrell
Copy link
Contributor Author

And you’ll absorb this there?

@filipnavara
Copy link
Contributor

Let's proceed with this one I guess. I'll submit it once this gets merged.

@lambdageek
Copy link
Member

@filipnavara the more I look at these two predicates, the more I wish that there was a comment that explained that they're meant to treat byref params as both in and out. It looked fine yesterday, but today I keep having to look twice.

@jaykrell
Copy link
Contributor Author

@monojenkins squash

@jaykrell
Copy link
Contributor Author

@monojenkins build failed

@monojenkins monojenkins merged commit edafa02 into mono:master Oct 17, 2019
ManickaP pushed a commit to ManickaP/runtime that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2020
Use functions instead of macros for is_in/is_out.




Commit migrated from mono/mono@edafa02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants