Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Request: Add significant missing SKPath methods/properties #60

Closed
alanricker opened this issue Apr 8, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Request: Add significant missing SKPath methods/properties #60

alanricker opened this issue Apr 8, 2016 · 2 comments
Assignees
@bholmes
Labels
status/skia-update-required status/up-for-grabs type/enhancement
Projects
Previous Releases

Comments

@alanricker
Copy link

Significant missing ones I don't of good alternatives for are:

ArcTo
FillType
AddArc
AddRoundRect

I can help implement these if necessary.
@bholmes
Copy link
Contributor

bholmes commented Apr 11, 2016

  • ArcTo - I was waiting for the next bump to get this one. The overload I want is not in our version.
  • FillType - added recently
  • AddArc - added recently
  • AddRoundRect - We can add now.

Please let me know if I have summarized properly or you have any issues with this plan.

@bholmes bholmes self-assigned this Apr 12, 2016
@alanricker
Copy link
Author

Thanks, looks like a good plan.

mattleibow added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 29, 2016
@mattleibow
Added extra SkPath methods (closes #14 closes #60)
cbadd8d
@mattleibow mattleibow modified the milestone: 1.53.1 Aug 15, 2016
@mattleibow mattleibow added this to To Be Classified in Previous Releases Jul 26, 2018
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 20, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@bholmes bholmes

Labels
status/skia-update-required status/up-for-grabs type/enhancement
Projects
No open projects
Previous Releases
To Be Classified
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@migueldeicaza @bholmes @mattleibow @alanricker