Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

package name #15

Closed
moodymudskipper opened this issue Aug 19, 2019 · 7 comments
Closed

package name #15

moodymudskipper opened this issue Aug 19, 2019 · 7 comments

Comments

@moodymudskipper
Copy link
Owner

this deserves its own issue.

I don't have a lot of ideas so far, apart from the fact I don't like the current one :).

The package checks, replaces, subsets, etc, and it uses infix operators for all operations.

infixer wasn't a bad name.
operators is taken, ops is catchy but not very specific.

could be a less technical but more evocative name, a tool, an animal, a sound...

could be an acronym made from what it does, wouldn't be very evocative but would be short enough to remember easily.

@karoliskoncevicius
Copy link
Collaborator

We can use infixer if you like it more, I already deleted my old repo. Also we can sleep on it see if some name comes up :) rangeops is not that bad too, but the package is not really only about ranges.

operators would have been a real good fit...

@karoliskoncevicius
Copy link
Collaborator

A short list of some that came to mind:

  • infixer (the one that was used before)
  • rangeops (current one)
  • intrix (read %in% tricks, similar to plotrix pacakge)
  • inops (%in% like operators)

@moodymudskipper
Copy link
Owner Author

after almost a month I think I like inops :)

@moodymudskipper
Copy link
Owner Author

@KKPMW can we go for inops and close this ?

@karoliskoncevicius
Copy link
Collaborator

@moodymudskipper agree about inops. Will you also rename the github repo?

@moodymudskipper
Copy link
Owner Author

Yes I will, I think it should go smoothly

@moodymudskipper
Copy link
Owner Author

done with f366a1a and 8d190fc

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants