You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are currently filtering out models that have supporting reads with evidence of internal priming.
I've seen a case for permissive where the model's 3' boundary is defined by a read that has fracA > 0.5 that so happened to be added first to the TALON database.
Is this the correct behaviour of TALON as it seems risky to build novel isoforms based on reads that might result from internal priming? I admit it is a genomic category so probably should exclude it anyway. Was just wondering.
Hi,
Unfortunately the only filtering that TALON does using the internal priming is after the TALON run. If you wish for these reads to not be used to generate transcript models I would perhaps try to filter your sam / bam alignments for those that have high A content at the 3' end before running TALON, as that might get you closer to your desired output.
We are currently filtering out models that have supporting reads with evidence of internal priming.
I've seen a case for permissive where the model's 3' boundary is defined by a read that has fracA > 0.5 that so happened to be added first to the TALON database.
Is this the correct behaviour of TALON as it seems risky to build novel isoforms based on reads that might result from internal priming? I admit it is a genomic category so probably should exclude it anyway. Was just wondering.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: