Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

/clear_octomap can't clear octomap in moveit #3380

Closed
dbdxnuliba opened this issue Mar 23, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #3134
Closed

/clear_octomap can't clear octomap in moveit #3380

dbdxnuliba opened this issue Mar 23, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #3134
Labels

Comments

@dbdxnuliba
Copy link

Description

Overview of your issue here.

I have found a bug in MoveIt. When the point cloud topic stops publishing, clicking "clear octomap" in MotionPlanning Panel of rviz does not clear the map. However, if the point cloud topic continues to publish, the map will continue to update based on the point cloud and cannot be cleared completely. This means that once Map Building is turned on in MoveIt, the map cannot be cleared unless MoveIt is restarted.
clear

Your environment

  • ROS Distro:Noetic
  • OS Version: Ubuntu 20.04
  • Source or Binary build?source
  • If binary, which release version?
  • If source, which branch?1.1.11
@rhaschke
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like the scene update is not correctly received by rviz. In the move_group's PS, the octomap is correctly cleared. This can be easily verified by disabling and re-enabling the display in rviz, which re-creates everything. I'm looking into the issue in more depth...

@dbdxnuliba
Copy link
Author

thanks for your prompt answer,did you mean the issue has been fixed and will pub in the next version ,

@rhaschke
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, the issue will be fixed with the next release.

@dbdxnuliba
Copy link
Author

ok ,thanks a lot

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants