Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a comment on closed bugs with pending needinfos #2404

Open
nchevobbe opened this issue May 23, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Add a comment on closed bugs with pending needinfos #2404

nchevobbe opened this issue May 23, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@nchevobbe
Copy link

While going through all my needinfos on Bugzilla, I realized a good chunk of them were on closed bugs.
One of the most common pattern is needinfo added on backed out patches, for which I fixed the issue and land the bug again, but forget to clear the needinfo.
I saw other cases where I was asked something , and someone else replied, which "unlocked" the bug so it was fixed later.

Having a small comment that would say something like "The bug was closed and has a needinfo for you. Clear the needinfo if it's not relevant anymore"

@suhaibmujahid
Copy link
Member

Thank you for filing the issue. Commenting on the bug itself could introduce some noise since this will trigger emails to all people in the CC. Alternatively, we could have the bot send an email with the list of all bugs that match the closed bugs that have needinfo on you.

WDYT? Am I missing something?

@nchevobbe
Copy link
Author

Commenting on the bug itself could introduce some noise since this will trigger emails to all people in the CC. Alternatively, we could have the bot send an email with the list of all bugs that match the closed bugs that have needinfo on you.

Sure! I was thinking of a comment as it would send a bugmail, so having the email directly without adding noise on bugzilla sounds good to me 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants