Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enforce strict equality #750

Open
ricordisamoa opened this issue May 7, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Enforce strict equality #750

ricordisamoa opened this issue May 7, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@ricordisamoa
Copy link
Contributor

As per #746 and for consistency with Python-based Jinja2, double equals should mean the same as the current triple equals, and triple equals should be dropped from syntax because there should be only one obvious way to do it.

2.x 3.x
== loose strict
=== strict not supported
@ArmorDarks
Copy link

I totally support it.

It's good practice not to use loose comparison in js community too, so I think it's double win

@carljm
Copy link
Contributor

carljm commented May 31, 2016

Yes, we should definitely do this for 3.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants