We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We should discuss whether "CA operator" or "CA owner" is the most appropriate term to use in the Mozilla Root Store Policy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I still prefer the term "Trust Service Provider" as defined in https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/319400_319499/319401/02.03.01_60/en_319401v020301p.pdf chapter 3.1 / https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32014R0910&from=EN#d1e791-73-1 instead of the ad-hoc definitions we have in BRs/CCADB/Mozilla Policy.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Maybe align with the term the new CA/B Definitions Workgroup chooses?
Great - I think it has been assigned to that WG. We'll see what the outcome is.
No branches or pull requests
We should discuss whether "CA operator" or "CA owner" is the most appropriate term to use in the Mozilla Root Store Policy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: