Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't try to needinfo regression authors, if they are inactive #1466

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jun 8, 2022

Conversation

marco-c
Copy link
Contributor

@marco-c marco-c commented Jun 8, 2022

Until #1465 is implemented as a generic solution, we should at least avoid needinfoing inactive
regression author (as it can be pretty common).

Checklist

  • Type annotations added to new functions
  • Docs added to functions touched in main classes
  • Dry-run produced the expected results

Until mozilla#1465 is implemented as a generic solution, we should at least avoid needinfoing inactive
regression author (as it can be pretty common).
suhaibmujahid
suhaibmujahid previously approved these changes Jun 8, 2022
Copy link
Member

@suhaibmujahid suhaibmujahid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

auto_nag/scripts/needinfo_regression_author.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@marco-c marco-c merged commit 48afa8b into mozilla:master Jun 8, 2022
@marco-c marco-c deleted the needinfo_regression_author branch June 8, 2022 13:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants