We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ref. #863 Use ./gradlew spotlessApply.
./gradlew spotlessApply
before:
private static final int Id_constructor = 1,
after:
In the case of after:, idswitch does not seem to find the Id_constructor. https://github.com/mozilla/rhino/tree/0c05d30e134aed65b9c3536d8ac3764590840a35/toolsrc/org/mozilla/javascript/tools/idswitch
idswitch
Id_constructor
ref. #847 Since findPrototypeId is now a string switch, I don't see much advantage in using idswitch in the future, should I modify it?
findPrototypeId
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For me my last hack was only to generate the new code. I think we can drop the idswitch tool and the generator hints from the code.
Sorry, something went wrong.
"Deleted code is debugged code." – Jeff Sickel
No branches or pull requests
ref. #863
Use
./gradlew spotlessApply
.before:
after:
In the case of after:,
idswitch
does not seem to find theId_constructor
.https://github.com/mozilla/rhino/tree/0c05d30e134aed65b9c3536d8ac3764590840a35/toolsrc/org/mozilla/javascript/tools/idswitch
ref. #847
Since
findPrototypeId
is now a string switch, I don't see much advantage in usingidswitch
in the future, should I modify it?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: