Provide arm and arm64 binaries

[onedr0p]

It would be cool to provide support for arm and arm64 binaries on the releases page.

[tapanhalani]

This is very much needed in our AWS setup. Is there any other way we can still install sops in ARM-based machines?

[DerrickMartinez]

+1 for AWS

[jvehent-sops-ci]

Has anyone tried? Is there a specific package that's incompatible with arm?

…

On Tue, Dec 29, 2020, at 7:24 PM, Derrick Martinez wrote: +1 for AWS — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#595 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEJTC2NFAKTS5W3MJNKKH7LSXJXLFANCNFSM4J4BD63A>.

[FnTm]

I gave this a go today, built the packages locally, and it seems like it shouldn't be that hard.
I'm hesitant to promise that I'll find time to cook up a PR for it, but the gist of it is that there are only a handful of commands in Makefile that need to be changed for a naive implementation, and then the Github workflow updated to also include packages for the new architectures.

[nklmilojevic]

#911

I added the support for arm64 build for Darwin, but it is fairly easy to add arm64 builds for linux as well.

[FnTm]

@nklmilojevic maybe we should combine forces between your PR (#911) and mine, which added arm64 builds for .deb and .rpm (#891) 🙂

[tlamr]

We would love to have this. @ajvb can we merge this please?

[ajvb]

This has been partially resolved by #911 (thank you @nklmilojevic!), but will be finished with #891 being merged in. Plan is to provide arm64 binaries and packages in the next release.

[ajvb]

arm64 binaries and packages provided in the newest release: https://github.com/mozilla/sops/releases/tag/v3.7.2