You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As of now, bindfs behaves like --rbind. It would be useful to be able to opt-out from this behavior.
Ideally, it should've probably been the default, but it's not possible to change it without breaking compatibility, or is it? There are options like -o bind and -o rbind, which might be of use here, although I'm not sure how, if at all possible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Bindfs could fairly easily be made to show directories that have a submount on them as empty, but if we want bindfs to show what's "underneath" a submount, then I don't know of a userspace API for that.
I guess bindfs could mount --bind to some internal place and view that instead of the original, but that would require root, and I think I'd rather avoid the complexity and error-proneness that would bring. I think this requirement is rare, and the user can do this manually too.
I'm curious, could you tell me more about your use-case?
As of now, bindfs behaves like
--rbind
. It would be useful to be able to opt-out from this behavior.Ideally, it should've probably been the default, but it's not possible to change it without breaking compatibility, or is it? There are options like
-o bind
and-o rbind
, which might be of use here, although I'm not sure how, if at all possible.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: