Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 13, 2024. It is now read-only.

Support for multi-line tasks #929

Open
dessalines opened this issue Sep 29, 2018 · 9 comments
Open

Support for multi-line tasks #929

dessalines opened this issue Sep 29, 2018 · 9 comments

Comments

@dessalines
Copy link

I currently have a PR out for todo.txt that would update the spec to allow multi-line tasks, which marks them off like this:

(A) a single line task
---
(B) A task enclosed between lines only consisting of dashes
is treated as a +multi-line task.
---

---
(C) this is another
+multi-line
task.
---

Multi-line tasks would effectively turn todo.txt into a powerful notebook application. I'd love to see the parser and simpletask updated to support this.

@mpcjanssen
Copy link
Owner

Will only be added if the Todo.txt format will support it.

@dessalines
Copy link
Author

I gotchu... unfortunately the https://github.com/todotxt/todo.txt maintainers are completely nonresponsive, and have been for over a year. The issues are piling up on that repo, with no action whatsoever. It really needs a clean fork or more implementations.... kind of like what commonmark is for markdown.

@mpcjanssen
Copy link
Owner

mpcjanssen commented Oct 25, 2018

I personally think the todo.txt format as it is, is fine. Most of the extensions proposed in that repo are trying to morph todo.txt into something it's not.
For example multiline tasks will break the one line -> one task property of todo.txt. And even with that it's still some ways from a notebook.
It's a sliding slope to reinventing org mode.

@varac
Copy link

varac commented Jan 5, 2019

Well, multi-line support is beeing discussed at todotxt/todo.txt#2. Would be good to reach a conclusion there first.

@dessalines
Copy link
Author

Its not being discussed. I issued a PR, but the maintainers haven't been active for over a year.

@mpcjanssen
Copy link
Owner

mpcjanssen commented Jan 6, 2019

I personally feel adding multiline tasks is moving into wrong tool for the job territory for todo.txt anyway.
Also, it will not be an easy change to make, so don't expect too much from this issue.

@smichel17
Copy link
Collaborator

Agreed and left my 2¢ over on the issue. Nothing wrong with multi-line in a file format that can express it, like markdown, but it's not the right fit for todo.txt.

@dessalines
Copy link
Author

@mpcjanssen So todo.txt is a fully dead project now. That repo has had zero activity for over two years. Would you be interested in helping maintain a fork?

@mpcjanssen
Copy link
Owner

@dessalines not really interested. i think todo.txt is mostly fine as it is.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants