Fix MPI_WIN_SYNC text #634
Labels
chap-rma
RMA Chapter Committee
errata
Errata items for the previous MPI Standard
had reading
Completed the formal proposal reading
mpi-4.1
For inclusion in the MPI 4.1 standard
no-no
Requires a no-no vote
passed final vote
Passed the final formal vote
passed first vote
Passed the first formal vote
scheduled reading
Reading is scheduled for the next meeting
wg-rma
RMA Working Group
Milestone
Problem
This text is horrible:
Proposal
Make it clear what WIN_SYNC actually does.
Changes to the Text
Say it's a memory barrier for unified, something else for separate.
Impact on Implementations
Nothing.
Impact on Users
Users can reason about RMA correctness in a useful way.
References and Pull Requests
TODO
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: