-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Double negation bug #1
Comments
Thanks! But that's just the syntax I'm using for propositional logic. The grammar is: p ::= Atomic | ~p | (p & p) | (p v p) | (p > p) | (p <> p) Negation doesn't introduce parentheses, so the double negation of (AvB) would be ~~(AvB), just like the double negation of P would be ~~P, rather than |
Oh okay, I see what you mean. My original though process was that (A NAND Also, great website! I particularly like the conversion to LaTeX table. |
Cool, happy to hear you like the program! The double-NAND formula you have |
Double negation results in an error message saying that the input is invalid.
Ex:
AvB works
(AvB) works
(~(AvB)) doesn't workThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: