Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replicate custom fields #16

Closed
berryant opened this issue Nov 28, 2018 · 6 comments · Fixed by #17
Closed

Replicate custom fields #16

berryant opened this issue Nov 28, 2018 · 6 comments · Fixed by #17

Comments

@berryant
Copy link

Hi,

I have been trying to replicate custom fields but could not achieve it.
I was thinking of something like CUSTOM_FIELD = ('customfield_10300', {'value': 'customfield_12345'}). Is it implemented ?
If not, do you know a way to do it (I guess it is quite easily feasible in code) ?

Thanks, Antoine

@berryant
Copy link
Author

berryant commented Dec 4, 2018

Hey, quicks heads up, I haven't been able to make it work, so I guess it is not implemented ? Would it be easy to implement ?

Regards

@mrts
Copy link
Owner

mrts commented Dec 10, 2018

Hi Antoine!

There is currently support for CUSTOM_FIELD, a single custom field that you can set to a default value for all issues. It does not replicate from old issue to new.

The code is here in case you are interested in implementing this:
https://github.com/mrts/ask-jira/blob/master/lib/export_import.py#L98

@berryant
Copy link
Author

I did not test this update but I will assume this is working. Highly appreciated and makes this project way more usable imo.

@mrts
Copy link
Owner

mrts commented Mar 26, 2019

@berryant could you test #17 ?

@berryant
Copy link
Author

@mrts Hi, I just tried with one custom field and it is working fine.

@mrts
Copy link
Owner

mrts commented Mar 27, 2019

@berryant Many thanks, much obliged!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants