New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Toggling skip_resolution affects package state #151
Comments
Because at that point (you may toggle it back after a year) the resolution state is not known until an attempt to resolve the package is made (on next resolver run). Setting it to unresolved would not be a correct thing to do, as it would be just making stuff up (likely, it won't be unresolved anymore). What we could do, however, is changing how not resolved (!= unresolved) packages are shown - if the package has |
Likewise, setting build to OK is not correct either, as last successful build may be one year old. |
That's why I suggested showing it as unknown. |
Packages which dependencies must be resolved (skip_resolution is False), but were not yet resolved should have state "unknown". Closes #151
Packages which dependencies must be resolved (skip_resolution is False), but were not yet resolved should have state "unknown". Closes #151
Packages which dependencies must be resolved (skip_resolution is False), but were not yet resolved should have state "unknown". Closes #151
As expected, setting skip_resolution=True in web UI for unresolved package makes it resolved and sets status different from unresolved (eg. ok, failing etc.) But then resetting skip_resolution back to False doesn't change state back to unresolved.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: