-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HoTT protocol and current/capacity integration #13
Comments
If there is interest, I could add the Hott protocol to oXs on RP2040 in the same way it was done in oXs for AVR 328P. Still, I would like to avoid too many parameters to set up. So the user does not have to compile him self and can just flash the RP2040 with a simple drag and drop.
|
For me this is a good solution. |
I could try to implement the Hott protocol in oXs on RP2040 but I do not have Graupner TX/RX. |
I added the code for HOTT protocol but I could not test it. |
I have tested the branch code on my standard setup with a HoTT receiver and a Radiomster TX16S with latest MPM firmware.
With GPS fix still no additional telemetry data, just the 8 standard HoTT values. |
Hello Mstrens, |
I looked at the code for Hott protocol. |
Hello Mstrens, |
Same here with GR-16 and TX16S with MPM (HoTT). |
the rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.... is already a good point. |
I made some changes for Hott protocol in a version 0.5.1 that is on github. |
Good Morning Mstrens, Protocol is Hott Config parameters are OK |
Second Test with MC28-GR24-HOTT, |
Hello Mstrens, Protocol is Sport (Frsky) |
There is currently nothing to fill temperature1 or 2.
I put on github a version 0.5.2 that is supposed to fix the wrong detection of MP6050. |
Hello Mstrens, |
Everything is OK Version = 0.5.2 Protocol is Hott Config parameters are OK |
I could test 0.5.2. When switching to S.Port the GPS height values are 10 times higher than with Hott (5200m instead of 520m). Best regards and thanks for your great work |
About vario I have a few questions:
In Hott, oXs simulates GAM device and this contains a lot of fields that oXs does not measure. This explain lot of 0). Perhaps there is a bug in Sport Gps Height. Is your real altitude around 520m? TMP1 is also strange. I do not sent TMP1. I suggest that, in Sport, you first delete all sensors (on the handset) and that you ask afterward to discover them again. |
I am using the MS6511 (GY-86) as baro sensor for my varios. |
I made a change this morning. |
I am just testing the 0.5.6 (with GR-16 and TX16S / EdgeTX 2.8) With Hott GPS seems to work now. But all GAxx labelled values are red (no Vario). |
I put on github a version 0.5.7 where I removed the display on PC of the GPS data (height) as this seems OK. I am not sure at all that this version should fix the issue about vario data not being regularly updated in Hott protocol. |
Hello Mstrens, |
Thanks for the proposal but the idea is just to have a look at the "official" timings. |
With the older oXS Ver.8.2.15 ,i have voltage, temp,gps,....and everything works very good |
@Satcomix |
V1, V2, Current, Capacity and GPS are ok, tomorow i will test vario again, and make a special build of oXs on 328P. |
If V1, V2 from oXs on RP2040 are ok on handset, then timings seems OK (at least for your RX and handset). Perhaps the user having the issue is using another type of Rx and/or handset but then I do not see why it should work for GPS? |
Good morning Mstrens, The handheld display shows the following: GPS BN220: Altitude MSL (real height above sea level), GPS Dir in °, distance home in meters, GPS speed, 3D FIX, number of received satellites. Vario BMP280 with +/- altitude and +/- rate of climb in m/s,it showed me plausible data. Test1 HOTT with BMP280: Protocol is Hott Config parameters are OK Test2 HOTT with GY86: Protocol is Hott Config parameters are OK I hope I was able to present my results clearly, Thank you. |
@onki69 |
The old OxS supported the very popular HoTT protocol for telemetry.
Is it planned to migrate this into the RP2040 project?
What about current and capacity?
Of course a current is nothing else than voltage at a sensor (shunt or hall sensor) but it is a different parameter in the telemetry protocol. Same applies to the capacity. Only FrSky calculates that in the transmitter software but not the others.
Best regards
Onki
P.S. I really like this project and the tiny little Pi Pico Zero. The configuration through the terminal is much more convenient than the config file solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: