Show the coordinates in a different form

[BranislavBeno]

It could be a useful addition when the application allows the user to choose a form of found coordinates.
I suggest extending command line interface with the new parameter -o respectively --output.
Supported values for suggested parameter should be:

• maven
• gradle
• gradle-short
• gradle-kotlin
• sbt
• ivy
• grape
• leiningen
• buildr

When the parameter will not be from the given list, the application throws an exception with explaining message.
When the parameter will be empty or blank, the application throws an exception with explaining message as well.

For sake of backwards compatibility, when an output form will not be explicitly defined, maven output form will be used by default.

Suggested parameter will be relevant only for search command and only when groupId, artifactId and version are defined.

[mthmulders]

Thank you for contributing this idea, @BranislavBeno. I like the idea a lot!

May I suggest naming the new parameter format rather than output? To me, output sounds more like "where should the output go".

Indeed, when not specified, let's stick with the current behaviour (formatting as pom.xml snippet). For unknown values, an empty value or a blank value, an appropriate error message is a good idea.

[BranislavBeno]

Thank you for your feedback, @mthmulders.
I agree, that format as a parameter identifier better fits its purpose.

[BranislavBeno]

Thank you for your feedback, @mthmulders.
I agree, that --format as a parameter identifier better fits its purpose.
On the other hand, in case of -f as a shortened version, there could be potential confusion with --full-name of class-search command.
How to deal with it?

[mthmulders]

Hmm, you're right. Thinking out loud:

1. Keep using --format as the full name of the parameter, shortened to -n (for "notation")
2. Name the parameter --notation, shortened to -n

I don't like a short parameter which doesn't even resemble the full name (option 1). But I still feel format is the best description of what this parameter does.

What do you think about it, @BranislavBeno?

[BranislavBeno]

You are right, --format is a better parameter identifier.
I will stick to your first suggestion.
This will also speed up PR preparation.
However, I'm of course still open to any changes within review. :-)

Best regards
Branislav

[mthmulders]

Added this feature with a3f54fd. Thanks you, @BranislavBeno, for your contribution!

[BranislavBeno]

Added this feature with a3f54fd. Thanks you, @BranislavBeno, for your contribution!

The pleasure was mine. :-)

[mthmulders]

Released in v0.3.0.