Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is a Footstone convenience class needed? #21

Closed
Stephen-Gates opened this issue Jan 1, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Is a Footstone convenience class needed? #21

Stephen-Gates opened this issue Jan 1, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Stephen-Gates
Copy link
Collaborator

At Toowong Cemetery we have a number of graves with both Headstones and Footstones.

Is there any value in having a Footstone convenience class that redirects to Tombstone, or should that detail be captured in another way?

@rwarren2
Copy link
Contributor

rwarren2 commented Jan 1, 2022

The image on the wikipedia page for footstone shows an example of a grave with both footstone and gravestone, so I am going to create a new term for this object.

@rwarren2
Copy link
Contributor

rwarren2 commented Jan 1, 2022

Created #Footstone as a subclass of #Tombstone, now disjoint with #Headstone which is now also a subclass of #Tombstone

@Stephen-Gates Stephen-Gates added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants