We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
你好 刚刚在公众号看到你们的论文,对于多尺度特征,可不可以理解为Fi单独送到SE?也就是说SE最后的sigmod在你这边是单独绘图的,前面的两层conv与relu是你论文中所述的SEWeight?
self.SEWeight = nn.Sequential( nn.Conv2d(channel, channel // reduction, 1, padding=0, bias=True), nn.ReLU(inplace=True), nn.Conv2d(channel // reduction, channel, 1, padding=0, bias=True), #nn.Sigmoid() )
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
我们是针对每个不同尺度的特征图计算SEweight,SEweight module代码见:https://github.com/murufeng/EPSANet/blob/main/models/SE_Weight_module.py
你好 刚刚在公众号看到你们的论文,对于多尺度特征,可不可以理解为Fi单独送到SE?也就是说SE最后的sigmod在你这边是单独绘图的,前面的两层conv与relu是你论文中所述的SEWeight? self.SEWeight = nn.Sequential( nn.Conv2d(channel, channel // reduction, 1, padding=0, bias=True), nn.ReLU(inplace=True), nn.Conv2d(channel // reduction, channel, 1, padding=0, bias=True), #nn.Sigmoid() )
Sorry, something went wrong.
@murufeng okay,知道了,但是我觉得有两个问题,不知道你这边有没有考虑过233333: 1.这样的话训练的话速度如何,我尝试将你们的方案替换了其他的att模块,训练的过程发现变慢不少。 2.split的过程中,看起来似乎每个块会唯一的使用一种depwise-conv,比如64通道,s=4,那么为什么前16通道就走3x3的conv,最后16层走9x9的。
No branches or pull requests
你好
刚刚在公众号看到你们的论文,对于多尺度特征,可不可以理解为Fi单独送到SE?也就是说SE最后的sigmod在你这边是单独绘图的,前面的两层conv与relu是你论文中所述的SEWeight?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: