Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Melisma" for Roman numerals analysis #23266

Open
lgvr123 opened this issue Jun 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

"Melisma" for Roman numerals analysis #23266

lgvr123 opened this issue Jun 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
feature request Used to suggest improvements or new capabilities

Comments

@lgvr123
Copy link

lgvr123 commented Jun 16, 2024

Your idea

Add a similar mechanism for the Roman Numeral Analysis(RNA) as for the lyrics where consecutive "_" will be transformed into a continuous melisma line.

For the RNA, this should be applied to the "-" and "=" signs.

Typing this:
Roman_analysis_melisma--ASIS

Would be transformed into this:
Roman_analysis_melisma

Problem to be solved

In RNA, the following analysis, although apparently correct, doesn't make sense.
Roman_analysis_melisma__Non functional

This leads to confusion, because a IV usually belongs to the the Sub-Dominant domain while in the measure 3, the IV belongs to the Tonic domain, as a Neighbour chord between to I's.

The same applies for the I64 in measure 5. It does not belong to the Tonic domain but to the Domibant domain as a Arpegiating Dominant chord (or Cadential64).

According to different sources, the correct notation for those cases is the following one (*):

Roman_analysis_melisma

Today, this is not possible to enter this notation.

This proposition will make this notation possible and easy to write.


(*) according (a.o.) to Clendinning/Marvin's "The Musician's Guide To Theory and Analysis" book:

example006
example005

Prior art

/

Additional context

/

@muse-bot muse-bot added the feature request Used to suggest improvements or new capabilities label Jun 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request Used to suggest improvements or new capabilities
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants