-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Arch Linux PKGBUILDs separation #16
Comments
Regarding As for source vs binary - having to install After all, I hope my reasoning makes sense. Even if I reintroduced |
An alternative would be to package it under EDIT btw I just remembered that github has a fixed link on the latest release, could be useful |
You're absolutely right, I hadn't considered that option. I used to host the git repo on GitHub ( I'll push it to GitHub again and you can do the PR adding the |
There: https://github.com/mvdan/aur-xurls Close this issue once you open a PR. If you don't want to do a PR, I'll have to admit that I'm too lazy to look into this and won't do it myself. |
No, the PKGBUILDs should be two, Are you sure you don't want to change the package's name? For example you just have to commit to GitHub as you always did, and then just launch a command that will generate the updated PKGBUILD with the changed version and everything, and you can commit that changes automatically or manually to the AUR. Why work when you can just automate and be lazy at the same time? :) |
Hmm, I remember seeing instances of a single PKGBUILD generating multiple packages, but I can't find the keyword for that now. I'll look into the tool and get back. |
The As for the normal version, you should use the tool I suggested or similar projects. Hell, you can even automate it with shell scripts, pretty nice :) Thank you! EDIT yep, there it is https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_package_guidelines |
Wait, you're confusing me. What I was going to look into is |
ooh, ok, I may have misunderstood, could you explain better what would you like to have, please? |
If I can accomplish that with small changes to my existing PKGBUILD, that's awesome. I'd rather do that than depend on a new tool to automate it, but that option is also OK. |
OK, now that's clearer. As for Everything clear? edit your PKGBUILD is already good actually, assuming you want to release a stable version. |
Not sure what that PR will be like, so just file it and I'll review. |
I noticed that the releases are not compiled, but are just a tarball of the source code :( |
Oh, this is just me getting mixed up, sorry. I do this for other Go projects of mine, like: https://github.com/mvdan/sh/releases Will upload them now. |
Thank you! |
Sorry to keep you waiting! |
Hi, just wanted to suggest an edit for the Arch Linux PKGBUILDs.
Wouldn't it be better and cleaner if you separated the
xurls
package inxurls
(uses the already compiledgo
releases from the Releases tab) andxurls-git
for the latest upstream, please?That way other users won't have to install
go
just to use your pretty cool piece of software. :)Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: