Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 4, 2023. It is now read-only.

Why doesn't Spidermonkey in MacPorts depend on autoconf213? #20296

Closed
adamv opened this issue Jun 5, 2013 · 6 comments
Closed

Why doesn't Spidermonkey in MacPorts depend on autoconf213? #20296

adamv opened this issue Jun 5, 2013 · 6 comments

Comments

@adamv
Copy link
Contributor

adamv commented Jun 5, 2013

The Spidermonkey port in MacPorts doesn't call autoconf and doesn't pull in a weird old version of autoconf:

https://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/dports/lang/spidermonkey185/Portfile

We should "do what they do" and drop the weird autoconf dep.

@cooljeanius
Copy link

That's probably be a better question to ask the MacPorts project themselves: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/39358

@adamv
Copy link
Contributor Author

adamv commented Jun 6, 2013

Spidermonkey compiled for me on Lion without any autoconf stuff.

Will try on Snow Leopard later.

I don't have a Leopard machine to test on.

@mistydemeo
Copy link
Member

Spidermonkey has had its private autoconf since fbf398f, when we were packaging a very different version, and it looks like it was never revisited. My guess is it hasn't been necessary at least since we went to 1.8.5 in 2011.

@mistydemeo
Copy link
Member

It also builds for me on 10.6 without any autoconf steps. I can test on Tiger and Leopard, but I'm basically 100% sure it's totally unnecessary.

@adamv adamv closed this as completed in b1da52a Jun 6, 2013
@adamv
Copy link
Contributor Author

adamv commented Jun 6, 2013

@cooljeanius you can close that issue you opened.

@cooljeanius
Copy link

@cooljeanius you can close that issue you opened.

That's ok, @larryv already closed it as "wontfix" for me

handyman5 pushed a commit to handyman5/homebrew that referenced this issue Oct 7, 2013
@Homebrew Homebrew locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 16, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants