/
complex-test.4th
1026 lines (867 loc) · 27.3 KB
/
complex-test.4th
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
( Title: Complex Word Set Tests
File: complex-test.fs
Author: David N. Williams
Version: 1.0.3b
License: LGPL
Last revision: December 9, 2010
)
\ Copyright (C) 2002, 2003, 2005-2010 David N. Williams
(
This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
version 2.1 of the License, or at your option any later version.
This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU Lesser General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
License along with this library; if not, write to the Free
Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston,
MA 02111-1307 USA.
This code tests our revisions of Julian V. Noble's complex
arithmetic lexicon in complex.fs [FSL Algorithm #60] and
complex-kahan.fs, and our C version of the latter, which
implements pfe's COMPLEX-EXT module.
It is known to work when floats are doubles or extended doubles,
but has not been tested with singles. In fact the tolerances
for fp comparisons used in this file are too small for singles.
The code is intended to test for formal correctness, not high
accuracy. It does not include any tests involving IEEE 754
floating-point values for signed zero, NaN, or infinity. A
separate file for such tests, complex-ieee-test.fs, may be found
here:
http://www.umich.edu/~williams/archive/forth/complex/
In particular, that file uses signed zero to compare values for
complex elementary and inverse functions on their branch cuts to
explicit formulas worked out from their OpenMath principal
expressions.
"Gauge functions" are functions that we test against. They are
defined independently here, sometimes in terms of already tested
functions.
Except for DEFER and IS, this code is compatible with ANS Forth,
with an environmental dependence on lower case.
Unattributed changes are by David N. Williams. The last
revision date above may reflect cosmetic changes not logged
here.
Version 1.0.3b
25Dec10 * Adapted for unified data/fp stack systems -- km
Version 1.0.3
9Dec10 * Revised library selection.
* Added tests for: COMPLEX COMPLEXES COMPLEX+
* Added exception test for ZLITERAL.
24Dec10 * Made [ElSE] upper case. km
Version 1.0.2
17Nov10 * Made PRINCIPAL-ARG a value, to agree with complex.fs
1.0.2, and revised test logic accordingly.
1Dec10 * Renamed COPYSIGN as FCOPYSIGN.
Version 1.0.1
14Aug09 * Replaced a holdover F-> by ->, discovered by Krishna
Myneni.
* Added report for separate/integrated fp stack.
* Made all reports conditional on VERBOSE, except
ABORT's.
* Revised library selection logic.
Version 1.0 [Forth Scientific Library]
17May09 * Retired former complex-test.fs and renamed
complex-ttest.fs as complex-test.fs.
* Added comment that no tests of IEEE special values are
included.
* Revised conditional compilation logic.
Version 0.9.8
4Mar09 * Temporarily renamed as "complex-ttest.fs". Adapted
complex-test.fs to use Anton Ertl's ttester.fs instead
of tester.fs and ftester.fs.
* Removed "(f:" and its redefinition here in favor of
"( f:", which hid an inadvertent use of it in
complex.fs, where it is not defined.
Version 0.9.7
4Sep08 * Renamed Z-ROT as -ZROT, affecting only pfe
COMPLEX-EXT.
20Sep08 * Renamed F-ROT as -FROT.
* Removed [DEFINED] conditional from ZROT and -ZROT
tests.
* Added ZLITERAL tests.
Version 0.9.6
6Sep06 * Really changed names of mixed argument words, not
actually done in 0.9.5.
* Removed tests for FPI, F0.0, F1.0,Z=0, Z=1, Z=I, which
were already commented out.
Version 0.9.5
24Apr05 * Changed names of mixed argument words to use jvn's
more telegraphic style. Also removed parentheses to
get -I*. Made adjustments for submission of
complex.fs 0.8.3 to the FSL.
3Sep05 * Fixed a typo discovered by Dirk Busch, namely, DEFINED
should have been [DEFINED]. It didn't cause a problem
on our system because both pfe and gforth have both
words, one an alias for the other.
Version 0.9.4
7Feb05 * Started moving tests with Inf, -Inf, and NaN,
including all tests of ZBOX, to complex-ieee-test.fs,
which was formerly named complex-szero-test.fs.
* Renamed ->}}F as }}F, and left existing }}F unchanged.
The latter cases now do an extra test for changes in
data stack input, a fail-safe that hurts nothing.
8Feb05 * Finished moving tests to complex-ieee-test.fs.
* Removed tests Z=0, etc., which we no longer define in
complex-kahan.fs or complex-ext.c. Those constants
were already unused in this code.
4Mar05 * Changed ZACOS, ZASIN, ZATAN, and ZACOT tests to avoid
the cuts. The cuts are tested in
complex-ieee-test.fs.
Version 0.9.3
12Jan05 * Reordered some tests and added FZ*, FZ/, ZF*, ZF/,
IFZ*, IFZ/, ZIF*, ZIF/.
* Added #ERRORS output, requiring ftester.fs 1.1.3 or
above.
14Jan05 * Added ZBOX.
15Jan05 * Revised to test for sign-conserving ZBOX.
Version 0.9.2
5Mar03 * Removed signed zero and branch cut tests. Now
they're in complex-szero-test.fs.
Version 0.9.1
21Feb03 * Added principal branch cut definitions and tests.
28Feb03 * Rearranged conditional includes.
Version 0.9.0
12Dec02 * Start.
18Feb03 * Release.
)
[UNDEFINED] \\ [IF]
: \\ ( -- ) -1 parse 2drop BEGIN refill 0= UNTIL ; [THEN]
1 CONSTANT NOBLE
2 CONSTANT KAHAN
3 CONSTANT PFE
\ USER-CONFIG: select complex library implementation
NOBLE
\ KAHAN
\ PFE
CONSTANT COMPLEX-TEST-LIB
: NOBLE? ( -- flag ) COMPLEX-TEST-LIB NOBLE = ;
: KAHAN? ( -- flag ) COMPLEX-TEST-LIB KAHAN = ;
: PFE? ( -- flag ) COMPLEX-TEST-LIB PFE = ;
NOBLE? [IF]
(
The nonprincipal argument can be used only with complex.fs, and
then only for arg, log, and nonintegral powers. Uncomment the
line below to override the complex.fs default, and use the
principal argument for those operations instead.
)
s" complex.4th" included \ defines PRINCIPAL-ARG
\ true to PRINCIPAL-ARG
[THEN]
KAHAN? [IF]
s" complex-kahan.4th" included
[THEN]
PFE? [IF] \ only for pfe
s" COMPLEX-EXT" environment? [IF] ( version) drop
[ELSE]
cr .( COMPLEX-EXT not available.) cr ABORT
[THEN]
[THEN]
[UNDEFINED] PRINCIPAL-ARG [IF] true VALUE PRINCIPAL-ARG [THEN]
s" ttester.4th" included
true verbose !
decimal
: z}t rr}t ;
: zz}t rrrr}t ;
: zzz}t 6 0 DO ftester LOOP ...}t ;
: ?s. ( c-addr len -- ) verbose @ IF cr type ELSE 2drop THEN ;
: ?emit-cr ( -- ) verbose @ IF cr THEN ;
: NONAME ( lib.case -- )
COMPLEX-TEST-LIB CASE
NOBLE OF s" Testing complex.fs." ENDOF
KAHAN OF s" Testing complex-kahan.fs." ENDOF
PFE OF s" Testing pfe complex words." ENDOF
ABORT" ***No complex words loaded"
ENDCASE ?s. ; NONAME
verbose @ [IF]
:noname ( -- fp.separate? )
depth >r 1e depth >r fdrop 2r> = ; execute
cr .( Floating-point stack is )
[IF] .( *separate*) [ELSE] .( *not separate*) [THEN]
.( from the data stack.)
[THEN]
\ assume floats are doubles or extended doubles
: near-defaults ( -- )
1E-15 rel-near f!
1E-15 abs-near f! ;
near-defaults
variable #errors 0 #errors !
:noname ( c-addr u -- )
(
Display an error message followed by the line that had the
error.
)
1 #errors +! error1 ; error-xt !
0.7853981633974483096157E0 FCONSTANT pi/4
-0.7853981633974483096157E0 FCONSTANT -pi/4
0.5497787143782138167310E1 FCONSTANT 7pi/4
[UNDEFINED] pi/2 [IF]
0.1570796326794896619231E1 FCONSTANT pi/2
[THEN]
-0.1570796326794896619231E1 FCONSTANT -pi/2
0.4712388980384689857694E1 FCONSTANT 3pi/2
0.2356194490192344928847E1 FCONSTANT 3pi/4
-0.2356194490192344928847E1 FCONSTANT -3pi/4
0.3926990816987241548078E1 FCONSTANT 5pi/4
[UNDEFINED] pi [IF]
0.3141592653589793238463E1 FCONSTANT pi
[THEN]
[UNDEFINED] -pi [IF]
-0.3141592653589793238463E1 FCONSTANT -pi
[THEN]
0.2718281828459045235360E1 FCONSTANT e
-0.2718281828459045235360E1 FCONSTANT -e
0.3678794411714423215955E0 FCONSTANT 1/e
-0.3678794411714423215955E0 FCONSTANT -1/e
[UNDEFINED] ln2 [IF]
0.6931471805599453094172E0 FCONSTANT ln2
[THEN]
-0.6931471805599453094172E0 FCONSTANT -ln2
0.1414213562373095048802E1 FCONSTANT rt2
-0.1414213562373095048802E1 FCONSTANT -rt2
0.7071067811865475244008E0 FCONSTANT 1/rt2
-0.7071067811865475244008E0 FCONSTANT -1/rt2
\ only two choices
PRINCIPAL-ARG [IF]
s" arg output -pi < arg <= pi" ?s.
-3pi/4 FCONSTANT 225arg
-pi/2 FCONSTANT 270arg
-pi/4 FCONSTANT 315arg
[ELSE]
s" arg output 0 <= arg < 2pi" ?s.
5pi/4 FCONSTANT 225arg
3pi/2 FCONSTANT 270arg
7pi/4 FCONSTANT 315arg
[THEN] ?emit-cr
defer gauge
defer func
defer inverse
\ ZVARIABLE, Z!, and Z@ have to be tested before the next
\ words are used.
ZVARIABLE zatemp ZVARIABLE zbtemp
: ?gauge ( f: z -- )
(
Compare the functions whose xt's are in FUNC and GAUGE.
)
zdup zatemp z! gauge -> zatemp z@ func ;
: ?2gauge ( f: z1 z2 -- )
(
Same as above with 2 complex arguments.
)
zbtemp z! zatemp z!
zatemp z@ zbtemp z@ gauge -> zatemp z@ zbtemp z@ func ;
: ?inverse ( f: z -- )
(
Check that INVERSE FUNCT, i.e., func[inverse], is the identity
mapping.
)
zdup zatemp z! inverse func -> zatemp z@ ;
: -z znegate ;
\ *** NONSTANDARD FP WORDS
testing S>F -FROT FNIP FTUCK 1/F F^2 F2* F2/
set-exact
t{ 0 s>f -> 0E r}t
t{ 137 s>f -> 137E r}t
t{ -137 s>f -> -137E r}t
t{ 1E1 2E1 3E1 -frot -> 3E1 1E1 2E1 rrr}t
t{ 1E1 2E1 fnip -> 2E1 r}t
t{ 1E1 2E1 ftuck -> 2E1 1E1 2E1 rrr}t
t{ 2E 1/f -> 0.5E r}t
t{ -2E 1/f -> -0.5E r}t
t{ 0E f^2 -> 0E r}t
t{ 2E f^2 -> 4E r}t
t{ -2E f^2 -> 4E r}t
t{ 0E f2* -> 0E r}t
t{ 128E f2* -> 256E r}t
t{ -12.8E f2* -> -25.6E r}t
set-near
t{ 1/rt2 f2* -> rt2 r}t
t{ -1/rt2 f2* -> -rt2 r}t
set-exact
t{ 0E f2/ -> 0E r}t
t{ 256E f2/ -> 128E r}t
t{ -25.6E f2/ -> -12.8E r}t
set-near
t{ rt2 f2/ -> 1/rt2 r}t
t{ -rt2 f2/ -> -1/rt2 r}t
[DEFINED] fcopysign [IF]
testing FCOPYSIGN
set-exact
t{ 11E 3E fcopysign -> 11E r}t
t{ -7E 5E fcopysign -> 7E r}t
t{ 5E -7E fcopysign -> -5E r}t
t{ -3E -11E fcopysign -> -3E r}t
[THEN]
\ *** LOAD AND STORE
testing ZCONSTANT ZVARIABLE ZLITERAL Z@ Z!
set-exact
t{ 1E 2E ZCONSTANT 1+i2 -> }t
t{ 1+i2 -> 1E 2E z}t
t{ : equ ZCONSTANT ; -> }t
t{ 1+i2 equ z=(1+i2) -> }t
t{ z=(1+i2) -> 1+i2 z}t
0E 0E ZCONSTANT 0+i0
1E 0E ZCONSTANT 1+i0
-1E 0E ZCONSTANT -1+i0
0E 1E ZCONSTANT 0+i1
0E -1E ZCONSTANT 0-i1
t{ ZVARIABLE zv1 -> }t
t{ 1+i2 zv1 z! -> }t
t{ zv1 z@ -> 1+i2 z}t
: lit-1+i0 ( f: -- 1+i0 )
[ 1+i0 ] ZLITERAL ;
t{ lit-1+i0 -> 1+i0 z}t
PFE? 0= [IF]
\ uncomment to see compile only exception:
\ 1+i0 ZLITERAL
\ t{ 1+i0 ' ZLITERAL CATCH zdrop -> -14 }t
t{ 1+i0 ' ZLITERAL CATCH -> 1+i0 -14 rrx}t \ for unified stack
[ELSE] \ pfe version is noop when interpreting
t{ 1+i0 ZLITERAL -> 1+i0 z}t
[THEN]
testing COMPLEX COMPLEXES COMPLEX+
t{ COMPLEX -> 2 floats }t
t{ 0 COMPLEXES -> 0 }t
t{ 3 COMPLEXES -> COMPLEX 3 * }t
t{ -1 COMPLEXES -> COMPLEX negate }t
t{ 1 COMPLEX+ -> 1 COMPLEX + }t
\ *** COMPLEX STACK MANIPULATION
testing ZDROP ZDUP ZSWAP ZOVER ZNIP ZTUCK ZROT -ZROT
set-exact
t{ 0+i0 zdrop -> }t
t{ 1+i0 zdup -> 1+i0 1+i0 zz}t
t{ 0+i0 1+i0 zswap -> 1+i0 0+i0 zz}t
t{ 0+i0 1+i0 zover -> 0+i0 1+i0 0+i0 zzz}t
t{ 0+i0 1+i0 znip -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ 0+i0 1+i0 ztuck -> 1+i0 0+i0 1+i0 zzz}t
t{ 0+i0 1+i0 0+i1 zrot -> 1+i0 0+i1 0+i0 zzz}t
t{ 0+i0 1+i0 0+i1 -zrot -> 0+i1 0+i0 1+i0 zzz}t
\ *** COMPLEX ALGEBRA
testing REAL IMAG CONJG Z*F Z/F Z* Z/ Z+ Z-
set-exact
t{ 1+i0 real -> 1E r}t
t{ 0+i1 imag -> 1E r}t
t{ 1E 2E conjg -> 1E -2E z}t
set-near \ true also works in pfe
t{ 1E 2E 3E z*f -> 3E 6E z}t
t{ 3E 6E 3E z/f -> 1E 2E z}t
t{ 1E 2E 3E 4E z* -> -5E 10E z}t
t{ 1E 2E 1+i0 z* -> 1E 2E z}t
t{ 1E 2E 0+i1 z* -> -2E 1E z}t
t{ 1E 1E 3E 4E z/ -> 7E 25E f/ -1E 25E f/ z}t
t{ 1E 1E 4E 3E z/ -> 7E 25E f/ 1E 25E f/ z}t
t{ 1E 2E 3E 4E z+ -> 4E 6E z}t
t{ 1E 2E 3E 4E z- -> -2E -2E z}t
testing ZNEGATE Z2* Z2/ I* -I*
set-near \ ignore signed zero
t{ 0+i0 -z -> 0+i0 z}t
t{ 0+i0 z2* -> 0+i0 z}t
t{ 0+i0 z2/ -> 0+i0 z}t
t{ 0+i0 i* -> 0+i0 z}t
t{ 0+i0 -i* -> 0+i0 z}t
set-exact
t{ 1E -2E -z -> -1E 2E z}t
t{ 40E1 -20E1 z2* -> 80E1 -40E1 z}t
t{ -40E1 20E1 z2* -> -80E1 40E1 z}t
t{ 50E1 -30E1 z2/ -> 25E1 -15E1 z}t
t{ -50E1 30E1 z2/ -> -25E1 15E1 z}t
t{ 40E1 -20E1 i* -> 20E1 40E1 z}t
t{ -40E1 20E1 i* -> -20E1 -40E1 z}t
t{ 40E1 -20E1 -i* -> -20E1 -40E1 z}t
t{ -40E1 20E1 -i* -> 20E1 40E1 z}t
\ *** MINIMAL (MIXED) OPERATIONS
testing X+ X- Y+ Y-
set-exact
t{ 1E 2E 3E x+ -> 4E 2E z}t
t{ 1E 2E 3E x- -> -2E 2E z}t
t{ 1E 2E 4E y+ -> 1E 6E z}t
t{ 1E 2E 4E y- -> 1E -2E z}t
[DEFINED] i*f/z [IF]
testing Z*>REAL Z*>IMAG Z*F Z/F F*Z F/Z Z*I*F -I*Z/F I*FZ* I*F/Z
set-exact
t{ 1E 2E 3E 4E z*>real -> -5E z}t
t{ 1E 2E 3E 4E z*>imag -> 10E z}t
t{ -1E 2E 3E z*f -> -1E 2E 3E 0E z* z}t
t{ -3E -6E 3E z/f -> -3E -6E 3E 0E z/ z}t
t{ 3E 1E 2E f*z -> 3E 0E 1E 2E z* z}t
set-near \ pfe works with exact
t{ 3E 6E 3E f/z -> 3E 0E 6E 3E z/ z}t
set-exact
t{ -1E 2E 3E z*i*f -> -1E 2E 0E 3E z* z}t
t{ -3E -6E 3E -i*z/f -> -3E -6E 0E 3E z/ z}t
t{ 3E 1E 2E i*f*z -> 0E 3E 1E 2E z* z}t
t{ 3E 6E 3E i*f/z -> 0E 3E 6E 3E z/ z}t
[THEN]
\ *** ALGEBRAIC FUNCTIONS
testing |Z| |Z|^2 1/Z Z^2 Z^N
set-exact
t{ 0+i0 |z| -> 0E r}t
t{ 0+i0 |z|^2 -> 0E r}t
t{ 0+i0 z^2 -> 0+i0 z}t
set-near
t{ 3E 4E |z| -> 5E r}t
t{ -3E 4E |z| -> 5E r}t
t{ 3E -4E |z| -> 5E r}t
t{ 3E 4E |z|^2 -> 25E r}t
t{ -3E 4E |z|^2 -> 25E r}t
t{ 3E -4E |z|^2 -> 25E r}t
t{ 3E 4E 1/z -> 3E 25E f/ -4E 25E f/ z}t
t{ -3E 4E 1/z -> -3E 25E f/ -4E 25E f/ z}t
t{ 3E -4E 1/z -> -3E -25E f/ 4E 25E f/ z}t
t{ 1+i0 1/z -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ 3E 4E z^2 -> -7E 24E z}t
t{ -3E 4E z^2 -> -7E -24E z}t
t{ 3E -4E z^2 -> -7E -24E z}t
t{ -3E -4E z^2 -> -7E 24E z}t
set-exact
t{ 0+i0 0 z^n -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ 1+i0 0 z^n -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ -1+i0 0 z^n -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ 0+i1 0 z^n -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ 0-i1 0 z^n -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ rt2 rt2 0 z^n -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ rt2 -rt2 0 z^n -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ -rt2 rt2 0 z^n -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ -rt2 -rt2 0 z^n -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ 0+i0 1 z^n -> 0+i0 z}t
t{ 1+i0 1 z^n -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ -1+i0 1 z^n -> -1+i0 z}t
t{ 0+i1 1 z^n -> 0+i1 z}t
t{ 0-i1 1 z^n -> 0-i1 z}t
t{ rt2 rt2 1 z^n -> rt2 rt2 z}t
t{ rt2 -rt2 1 z^n -> rt2 -rt2 z}t
t{ -rt2 rt2 1 z^n -> -rt2 rt2 z}t
t{ -rt2 -rt2 1 z^n -> -rt2 -rt2 z}t
t{ 0+i0 2 z^n -> 0+i0 z}t
t{ 1+i0 2 z^n -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ -1+i0 2 z^n -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ 0+i1 2 z^n -> -1+i0 z}t
set-near \ avoid signed zero discrepancy
t{ 0-i1 2 z^n -> -1+i0 z}t
set-exact
t{ 3E 4E 2 z^n -> -7E 24E z}t
t{ -3E 4E 2 z^n -> -7E -24E z}t
t{ 3E -4E 2 z^n -> -7E -24E z}t
t{ -3E -4E 2 z^n -> -7E 24E z}t
t{ 0+i0 5 z^n -> 0+i0 z}t
t{ 1+i0 5 z^n -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ -1+i0 5 z^n -> -1+i0 z}t
t{ 0+i1 5 z^n -> 0+i1 z}t
t{ 0-i1 5 z^n -> 0-i1 z}t
t{ 2E 2E 5 z^n -> -128E -128E z}t
t{ 2E -2E 5 z^n -> -128E 128E z}t
t{ -2E 2E 5 z^n -> 128E -128E z}t
t{ -2E -2E 5 z^n -> 128E 128E z}t
\ *** ELEMENTARY FUNCTIONS
testing ARG >POLAR POLAR> ZSQRT ZLN ZEXP Z^
set-exact
t{ 0+i0 arg -> 0E r}t
t{ 1+i0 arg -> 0E r}t
t{ 0+i1 arg -> pi/2 r}t
t{ 0-i1 arg -> 270arg r}t
t{ -1+i0 arg -> pi r}t
set-near
t{ 2E 2E arg -> pi/4 r}t
t{ 3E -3E arg -> 315arg r}t
set-exact
t{ -rt2 rt2 arg -> 3pi/4 r}t
t{ -rt2 -rt2 arg -> 225arg r}t
rt2 f2* FCONSTANT 2rt2
rt2 3E f* FCONSTANT 3rt2
set-exact
t{ 0+i0 >polar -> 0+i0 rr}t
t{ 1+i0 >polar -> 1+i0 rr}t
t{ 0+i1 >polar -> 1E pi/2 rr}t
t{ 0-i1 >polar -> 1E 270arg rr}t
t{ -1+i0 >polar -> 1E pi rr}t
set-near
t{ 2E 2E >polar -> 2rt2 pi/4 rr}t
t{ 3E -3E >polar -> 3rt2 315arg rr}t
t{ -rt2 rt2 >polar -> 2E 3pi/4 rr}t
t{ -rt2 -rt2 >polar -> 2E 225arg rr}t
set-exact
t{ 0+i0 polar> -> 0+i0 z}t
t{ 1+i0 polar> -> 1+i0 z}t
set-near
t{ 1E pi/2 polar> -> 0+i1 z}t \ Re(f) = -6.123234E-17
t{ 1E -pi/2 polar> -> 0-i1 z}t \ Re(f) = 6.123234E-17
t{ 1E pi polar> -> -1+i0 z}t \ Im(f) = 1.224647E-16
t{ 2rt2 pi/4 polar> -> 2E 2E z}t
t{ 3rt2 -pi/4 polar> -> 3E -3E z}t
t{ 2E 3pi/4 polar> -> -rt2 rt2 z}t
t{ 2E -3pi/4 polar> -> -rt2 -rt2 z}t
: gsqrt ( f: z -- exp[[ln|z|+iarg[z]]/2] )
zln z2/ zexp ;
' zsqrt is func ' gsqrt is gauge
set-near
t{ 0+i0 zsqrt -> 0+i0 z}t
t{ 2E 0E ?gauge z}t
t{ -2E 0E ?gauge z}t \ Re(g) = 8.659561E-17
t{ 0E 2E ?gauge z}t
t{ 0E -2E ?gauge z}t
t{ rt2 rt2 ?gauge z}t
t{ rt2 -rt2 ?gauge z}t
t{ -rt2 rt2 ?gauge z}t
t{ -rt2 -rt2 ?gauge z}t
set-exact
t{ 1+i0 zln -> 0+i0 z}t
t{ 0+i1 zln -> 0E pi/2 z}t
t{ 0-i1 zln -> 0E 270arg z}t
t{ -1+i0 zln -> 0E pi z}t
set-near
t{ -2E 0E zln -> ln2 pi z}t
t{ rt2 rt2 zln -> ln2 pi/4 z}t
t{ rt2 -rt2 zln -> ln2 315arg z}t
t{ -rt2 rt2 zln -> ln2 3pi/4 z}t
t{ -rt2 -rt2 zln -> ln2 225arg z}t
1/rt2 f2/ FCONSTANT 1/2rt2
1/2rt2 fnegate FCONSTANT -1/2rt2
set-exact
t{ 0+i0 zexp -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ ln2 0E zexp -> 2E 0E z}t
set-near
t{ -ln2 0E zexp -> 0.5E 0E z}t
t{ 0E pi zexp -> -1+i0 z}t \ Im(f) = 1.224647E-16
t{ 0E pi/2 zexp -> 0+i1 z}t \ Re(f) =6.123234E-17
t{ 0E -pi/2 zexp -> 0+i1 conjg z}t \ Re(f) = 6.123234E-17
t{ 0E pi/4 zexp -> 1/rt2 1/rt2 z}t
t{ 0E -pi/4 zexp -> 1/rt2 -1/rt2 z}t
t{ 0E 3pi/4 zexp -> -1/rt2 1/rt2 z}t
t{ 0E -3pi/4 zexp -> -1/rt2 -1/rt2 z}t
t{ ln2 pi/4 zexp -> rt2 rt2 z}t
t{ ln2 -pi/4 zexp -> rt2 -rt2 z}t
t{ -ln2 3pi/4 zexp -> -1/2rt2 1/2rt2 z}t
t{ -ln2 -3pi/4 zexp -> -1/2rt2 -1/2rt2 z}t
set-exact
t{ 1+i0 0+i0 z^ -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ -1+i0 0+i0 z^ -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ 0+i1 0+i0 z^ -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ 0-i1 0+i0 z^ -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ rt2 rt2 0+i0 z^ -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ rt2 -rt2 0+i0 z^ -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ -rt2 rt2 0+i0 z^ -> 1+i0 z}t
t{ -rt2 -rt2 0+i0 z^ -> 1+i0 z}t
: identical ( f: z -- z ) ;
: z^(z=1) 1+i0 z^ ;
' z^(z=1) is func ' identical is gauge
set-near
t{ 1+i0 ?gauge z}t
t{ -1+i0 ?gauge z}t \ Im(f) = 1.224647E-16
t{ 0+i1 ?gauge z}t \ Re(f) = 6.123234E-17
t{ 0-i1 ?gauge z}t \ Re(f) = 6.123234E-17
t{ rt2 rt2 ?gauge z}t
t{ rt2 -rt2 ?gauge z}t
t{ -rt2 rt2 ?gauge z}t
t{ -rt2 -rt2 ?gauge z}t
:noname ( f: z -- z^(1+i2) 1+i2 z^ ; is func
:noname ( f: z -- z^(1+i2) zln 1+i2 z* zexp ; is gauge
t{ 1+i0 ?gauge z}t
t{ -1+i0 ?gauge z}t
t{ 0+i1 ?gauge z}t
t{ 0-i1 ?gauge z}t
t{ rt2 rt2 ?gauge z}t
t{ rt2 -rt2 ?gauge z}t \ pfe 1
t{ -rt2 rt2 ?gauge z}t
t{ -rt2 -rt2 ?gauge z}t \ pfe 2
testing ZCOSH ZSINH ZTANH ZCOTH ZCOS ZSIN ZTAN ZCOT
e 1/e f+ f2/ FCONSTANT ch1
e 1/e f- f2/ FCONSTANT sh1
ch1 0E ZCONSTANT zch1
sh1 0E ZCONSTANT zsh1
sh1 ch1 f/ FCONSTANT th1
ch1 sh1 f/ FCONSTANT cth1
th1 0E ZCONSTANT zth1
cth1 0E ZCONSTANT zcth1
ch1 sh1 rt2 z/f ZCONSTANT zC1
zC1 conjg ZCONSTANT zC2
sh1 ch1 rt2 z/f ZCONSTANT zC3
zC3 conjg ZCONSTANT zC4
set-exact
t{ 0+i0 zcosh -> 1+i0 z}t
set-near
t{ 1+i0 zcosh -> zch1 z}t
t{ -1+i0 zcosh -> zch1 z}t
t{ 0E pi/2 zcosh -> 0+i0 z}t \ Re(f) = 6.123234E-17
t{ 0E -pi/2 zcosh -> 0+i0 z}t \ Re(f) = 6.123234E-17
t{ 1E pi/4 zcosh -> zC1 z}t
t{ 1E -pi/4 zcosh -> zC2 z}t
t{ -1E pi/4 zcosh -> zC2 z}t
t{ -1E -pi/4 zcosh -> zC1 z}t
set-exact
t{ 0+i0 zsinh -> 0+i0 z}t
set-near
t{ 1+i0 zsinh -> zsh1 z}t
t{ -1+i0 zsinh -> sh1 fnegate 0E z}t
t{ 0E pi/2 zsinh -> 0+i1 z}t
t{ 0E -pi/2 zsinh -> 0+i1 conjg z}t
t{ 1E pi/4 zsinh -> zC3 z}t
t{ 1E -pi/4 zsinh -> zC4 z}t
t{ -1E pi/4 zsinh -> zC4 -z z}t
t{ -1E -pi/4 zsinh -> zC3 -z z}t
1E pi/4 zdup zsinh zswap zcosh z/ ZCONSTANT ztanhA
1E -pi/4 zdup zsinh zswap zcosh z/ ZCONSTANT ztanhB
ztanhA 1/z ZCONSTANT zcothA
ztanhB 1/z ZCONSTANT zcothB
set-exact
t{ 0+i0 ztanh -> 0+i0 z}t
set-near
t{ 1+i0 ztanh -> zth1 z}t
t{ -1+i0 ztanh -> zth1 -z z}t
t{ 0E pi/4 ztanh -> 0+i1 z}t
t{ 0E -pi/4 ztanh -> 0+i1 conjg z}t
t{ 1E pi/4 ztanh -> ztanhA z}t
t{ 1E -pi/4 ztanh -> ztanhB z}t
t{ -1E pi/4 ztanh -> ztanhB -z z}t
t{ -1E -pi/4 ztanh -> ztanhA -z z}t
set-near
t{ 1+i0 zcoth -> zcth1 z}t
t{ -1+i0 zcoth -> zcth1 -z z}t
t{ 0E pi/4 zcoth -> 0+i1 conjg z}t
t{ 0E -pi/4 zcoth -> 0+i1 z}t
t{ 1E pi/4 zcoth -> zcothA z}t
t{ 1E -pi/4 zcoth -> zcothB z}t
t{ -1E pi/4 zcoth -> zcothB -z z}t
t{ -1E -pi/4 zcoth -> zcothA -z z}t
:noname -i* zcos ; is func
' zcosh is gauge
set-exact
t{ 0+i0 ?gauge z}t
t{ 1+i0 ?gauge z}t
t{ -1+i0 ?gauge z}t
t{ 0E pi/2 ?gauge z}t
t{ 0E -pi/2 ?gauge z}t
t{ 1E pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ 1E -pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ -1E pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ -1E -pi/4 ?gauge z}t
:noname i* zsin ; is func
:noname zsinh i* ; is gauge
set-near
t{ 0+i0 ?gauge z}t
t{ 1+i0 ?gauge z}t
t{ -1+i0 ?gauge z}t
t{ 0E pi/2 ?gauge z}t
t{ 0E -pi/2 ?gauge z}t
t{ 1E pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ 1E -pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ -1E pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ -1E -pi/4 ?gauge z}t
:noname i* ztan ; is func
:noname ztanh i* ; is gauge
set-near
t{ 0+i0 ?gauge z}t
t{ 1+i0 ?gauge z}t
t{ -1+i0 ?gauge z}t
t{ 0E pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ 0E -pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ 1E pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ 1E -pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ -1E pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ -1E -pi/4 ?gauge z}t
:noname i* zcot ; is func
:noname zcoth -i* ; is gauge
set-near
t{ 1+i0 ?gauge z}t
t{ -1+i0 ?gauge z}t
t{ 0E pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ 0E -pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ 1E pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ 1E -pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ -1E pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ -1E -pi/4 ?gauge z}t
\ *** INVERSE FUNCTIONS
true to PRINCIPAL-ARG
testing ZASINH ZACOSH ZATANH ZACOTH
\ Inverse hyperbolic gauges. Note that in the principal
\ expressions for the gauges here, and in GACOS in the next
\ section, it is important to use "1E x+" instead of "1+i0 z+"
\ to preserve the sign of zero on the branch cuts. That is
\ not tested in this file (see complex-ieee-test.fs).
: gasinh ( z -- [ln[z+sqrt[z^2+1]]] )
zdup z^2 1E x+ zsqrt z+ zln ;
: gacosh ( z -- 2ln[sqrt[[z+1]/2]+sqrt[[z-1]/2] )
zdup 1E x- z2/ zsqrt zswap 1E x+ z2/ zsqrt
z+ zln z2* ;
: gatanh ( z -- [ln[1+z]-ln[1-z]]/2 )
zdup 1E x+ zln zswap -z 1E x+ zln z- z2/ ;
: gacoth ( z = [ln[-1-z]-ln[1-z]]/2 )
(
Use -1E 0E Z+ instead of 1+i0 Z- so -0 doesn't give the wrong
value on the ZLN principal branch cut.
)
-z zdup -1+i0 z+ zln zswap 1+i0 z+ zln z- z2/ ;
\ Check that the gauges are inverses. The order func(inverse)
\ used here, e.g., ZACOSH COSH in Forth reverse polish, should
\ work for all branches of the inverse when func is meromorphic.
' gasinh is inverse ' zsinh is func
set-near
t{ 0+i0 ?inverse z}t
t{ zsh1 ?inverse z}t
t{ zsh1 -z ?inverse z}t
t{ 0+i1 ?inverse z}t
t{ 0+i1 conjg ?inverse z}t
t{ zC3 ?inverse z}t
t{ zC4 ?inverse z}t
t{ zC4 -z ?inverse z}t
t{ zC3 -z ?inverse z}t
' zasinh is func ' gasinh is gauge
set-near
t{ 0+i0 ?gauge z}t
t{ zsh1 ?gauge z}t
t{ zsh1 -z ?gauge z}t
t{ 0+i1 ?gauge z}t
t{ 0+i1 conjg ?gauge z}t
t{ zC3 ?gauge z}t
t{ zC4 ?gauge z}t
t{ zC4 -z ?gauge z}t
t{ zC3 -z ?gauge z}t
' gacosh is inverse ' zcosh is func
set-near
t{ 1+i0 ?inverse z}t
t{ zch1 ?inverse z}t
t{ 0+i0 ?inverse z}t \ Re(f^-1 f) = 6.123234E-17, Im((f^-1 f) = 4.440892E-16
t{ zC1 ?inverse z}t
t{ zC2 ?inverse z}t
' zacosh is func ' gacosh is gauge
set-near
t{ 1+i0 ?gauge z}t
t{ zch1 ?gauge z}t
t{ 0+i0 ?gauge z}t \ Re(g) = 2.220446E-16
t{ zC1 ?gauge z}t
t{ zC2 ?gauge z}t
' gatanh is inverse ' ztanh is func
set-near
t{ 0+i0 ?inverse z}t
t{ zth1 ?inverse z}t
t{ zth1 -z ?inverse z}t
t{ 0+i1 ?inverse z}t
t{ 0+i1 conjg ?inverse z}t
t{ ztanhA ?inverse z}t
t{ ztanhB ?inverse z}t
t{ ztanhB -z ?inverse z}t
t{ ztanhA -z ?inverse z}t
' zatanh is func ' gatanh is gauge
set-near
t{ 0+i0 ?gauge z}t
t{ 0+i1 ?gauge z}t
t{ 1E 1E ?gauge z}t
t{ 1E -1E ?gauge z}t
t{ -1E 1E ?gauge z}t
t{ -1E -1E ?gauge z}t
t{ 0+i1 conjg ?gauge z}t
t{ zth1 ?gauge z}t
t{ zth1 -z ?gauge z}t
t{ ztanhA ?gauge z}t
t{ ztanhB ?gauge z}t
t{ ztanhB -z ?gauge z}t
t{ ztanhA -z ?gauge z}t
' gacoth is inverse ' zcoth is func
set-near
t{ zcth1 ?inverse z}t
t{ zcth1 -z ?inverse z}t
t{ 0+i1 conjg ?inverse z}t
t{ 0+i1 ?inverse z}t
t{ zcothA ?inverse z}t
t{ zcothB ?inverse z}t
t{ zcothB -z ?inverse z}t
t{ zcothA -z ?inverse z}t
[DEFINED] zacoth [IF]
' zacoth is func ' gacoth is gauge
set-near
t{ zcth1 ?gauge z}t
t{ zcth1 -z ?gauge z}t
t{ 0+i1 conjg ?gauge z}t
t{ 0+i1 ?gauge z}t
t{ zcothA ?gauge z}t
t{ zcothB ?gauge z}t
t{ zcothB -z ?gauge z}t
t{ zcothA -z ?gauge z}t
[THEN]
testing ZASIN ZACOS ZATAN ZACOT
\ Inverse trigonometric gauges. GACOS is uncouth in the sense
\ of Corless, Davenport, Jeffrey, and Watt, i.e., not related to
\ the inverse hyperbolic counterpart by the naive identity.
: gacos ( f: z -- -2iln[sqrt[[1+z]/2]+isqrt[[1-z]/2]] )
zdup 1E x+ z2/ zsqrt zswap -z 1E x+ z2/ zsqrt
i* z+ zln z2* -i* ;
: gasin i* gasinh -i* ;
: gatan i* gatanh -i* ;
: gacot -i* gacoth -i* ;
\ We've checked that the inverse hyperbolic gauges are inverses,
\ so where they're couthly related, it's sufficient to check one
\ case of each inverse trigonometric gauge, where both input and
\ output are full complex numbers. We checked by hand that zC1
\ works.
' gacos is inverse ' zcos is func
set-near
t{ zC1 ?inverse z}t
t{ zC2 ?inverse z}t
t{ zC3 ?inverse z}t
t{ zC4 ?inverse z}t
t{ zC1 gasin zsin -> zC1 z}t
t{ zC1 gatan ztan -> zC1 z}t
t{ zC1 gacot zcot -> zC1 z}t
' zacos is func
' gacos is gauge
\ stay off the cut |x| >= 1
set-near
t{ 0E 0E ?gauge z}t \ Im(g) = -4.440892E-16
t{ pi/4 0E ?gauge z}t \ Im(g) = 2.220446E-16
t{ -pi/4 0E ?gauge z}t \ Im(g) = 2.220446E-16
t{ 0E pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ 0E -pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ 0E pi/2 ?gauge z}t
t{ 0E -pi/2 ?gauge z}t
t{ pi/2 pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ pi/2 -pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ -pi/2 pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ -pi/2 -pi/4 ?gauge z}t
' zasin is func
' gasin is gauge
\ stay off the cut |x| >= 1
set-near
t{ 0E 0E ?gauge z}t
t{ pi/4 0E ?gauge z}t \ Im(g) = -1.348379E-17
t{ -pi/4 0E ?gauge z}t \ Im(g) = -1.348379E-17
t{ 0E pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ 0E -pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ 0E pi/2 ?gauge z}t
t{ 0E -pi/2 ?gauge z}t
t{ pi/2 pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ pi/2 -pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ -pi/2 pi/4 ?gauge z}t
t{ -pi/2 -pi/4 ?gauge z}t
' zatan is func
' gatan is gauge
\ stay off the cut |y| >= 1
set-near
t{ 0E 0E ?gauge z}t
t{ pi/4 0E ?gauge z}t
t{ -pi/4 0E ?gauge z}t
t{ 0E pi/4 ?gauge z}t