Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

BME/BMP280 consuming too much memory #393

Closed
user2684 opened this issue Jul 24, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

BME/BMP280 consuming too much memory #393

user2684 opened this issue Jul 24, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
bug
Projects
v1.9

Comments

@user2684
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluate alternative libraries
@user2684 user2684 added the bug label Jul 24, 2018
@user2684 user2684 added this to Triage in v1.8 via automation Jul 24, 2018
@user2684 user2684 moved this from Triage to Bugs in v1.8 Jul 24, 2018
@user2684 user2684 removed this from Bugs in v1.8 Oct 1, 2018
@user2684
Copy link
Contributor Author

user2684 commented Oct 1, 2018

Too many sensors would be impacted, evaluating other libraries seems not feasible. Maybe making the forecast calculation optional would save some storage but since sensor-specific define are not supported right now, postponing this

@user2684 user2684 added this to Triage in v1.9 via automation Feb 3, 2019
@user2684 user2684 moved this from Triage to Bugs in v1.9 Feb 3, 2019
@user2684 user2684 mentioned this issue May 9, 2020
Merged
@user2684
Copy link
Contributor Author

user2684 commented May 9, 2020

Added optional NODEMANAGER_SENSOR_BOSCH_LITE define

@user2684 user2684 closed this as completed May 9, 2020
v1.9 automation moved this from Bugs to Done May 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug
Projects
v1.9
  
Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@user2684