You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks to my unhygienic file numbering, 21:27 in the app shows book_of_life2.mov , whereas it should show book_of_life.mov . Again, the number extensions in the filenames should only be ignored if the number immediately follows an underscore ( _ ). Apologies for naming and numbering my files so terribly!
However I kinda like this mix-up, book_of_life2.mov works at least as well as book_of_life.mov , even though it's a repeat. What do you think, aesthetically?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ah yeah sorry, from looking at the filenames it seemed quite challenging to figure out the right algorithm (some files had very funky different names) so I just used the Levenschtein distance algorithm instead of hand-coding anything... it seems to have worked in the vast majority of cases though!
One unfortunate thing is that even if we repeat, because of the way things work, we'll actually be putting two copies of the exact same movie in the install, and the engineer in me chafes at the waste of space! lol. I guess it would be easiest and most preferable for me to use the movie you intended, to maintain as much parity with the website as possible, but it's up to you!
Thanks to my unhygienic file numbering, 21:27 in the app shows book_of_life2.mov , whereas it should show book_of_life.mov . Again, the number extensions in the filenames should only be ignored if the number immediately follows an underscore ( _ ). Apologies for naming and numbering my files so terribly!
However I kinda like this mix-up, book_of_life2.mov works at least as well as book_of_life.mov , even though it's a repeat. What do you think, aesthetically?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: