Option to specify generated class visibility

[mariotaku]

Thanks for this awesome implementation!

It would be nice if visibility can be changed (to default or internal).

[mzaks]

Do you mean for generated classes or for the infrastructure?

[mariotaku]

@mzaks Generated classes

[mzaks]

Could you please elaborate on that. I just want to understand the use case better.
FlatBuffers support namesapcing which I didn't supported yet because there is no namespace concept in Swift. But it would be possible to namespace by nesting classes inside empty enums. At some point I wanted to drop the idea but now I am reevaluating it. specifically if you have multiple fbs file wich would like to reuse tables.

[mariotaku]

Current implementation only generate public classes, when using in App development, all extensions will have to made more public, when developing frameworks, we may want to hide some classes instead of making them public.

[mzaks]

You mean if you want to build a Framework which make use of the generated classes and you would not want to expose those classes to the end user (application developer)
OK this is a valid point. I could introduce a custom attribute. It would be specific for FlatBuffersSwift code generator because the main flatc code generator doe s not support such feature out of the box afaik.

[mzaks]

I created a separate issue in code generation project and I am closing this one.
mzaks/FlatBuffersSwiftCodeGen#7