License of the project?

[iaguis]

Hi!

We vendored your project in rkt but we just noticed it doesn't have a license.

We will revert it anyway because we can't link to libacl but we want to make a version that uses dlopen instead of linking to libacl based on yours (rkt/rkt#1963). Would that be ok?

In rkt we use the Apache 2.0 license so if you could use that licence that would be great.
.
Thanks!

[naegelejd]

Hi, thanks for reaching out!

I'm inclined to use the MIT license as I normally do. Apologies for not already including it. It's quite compatible with the Apache 2.0 license so hopefully that will work.

Much of the top-level code simply wraps libacl, so not much IP, but if you do use anything I'd like acknowledgement. Thanks, I'm looking forward to using rkt!

[iaguis]

Great, that should work for us. Thanks again!