Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More check_dig needed options #584

Open
fpoulain opened this issue Jan 29, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

More check_dig needed options #584

fpoulain opened this issue Jan 29, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@fpoulain
Copy link

Hi,

I would like to monitor if my NS records are still defined as I want and that there is no unwanted record. Unfortunately, check_dig doesn't allow this.

The '-a' option should be repeatable, allowing to define more than one address to expect in the answer (like for check_dns).

There is no way to indicate that I don't want any other answer than expected. Maybe the simple way to deal with that should be to add an option strictly checking the number of records in the answer.

How do you think about it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant