Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

When using pti, which list must be used? #15

Closed
opsdep opened this issue Jul 30, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

When using pti, which list must be used? #15

opsdep opened this issue Jul 30, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file question Further information is requested

Comments

@opsdep
Copy link
Contributor

opsdep commented Jul 30, 2020

As far as I know, the pti repo uses two lists, and this two list provide different outputs sometimes. For example one list provides:
image

and the other one is :
image

It must be justified which one should we use for the future. This causes problems in the future especially in the case of working with cumulative parameters in its corresponding repetative mechanism that we developed recently in the metanorm repo.

Up to now, we have used search_cf_standard_name_list method of pti for normalizers in metanorm or sometimes get_cf_standard_name method of it.
BUT, if we use get_wkt_variable method, it will causes above mentioned inconsistency and may cause repetitive parameter(that have the same statndard name) assignment to the same dataset.

Please, justify about the usage of pti dear @akorosov .

@opsdep opsdep added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file question Further information is requested labels Jul 30, 2020
@opsdep
Copy link
Contributor Author

opsdep commented Aug 3, 2020

@akorosov
In order to solve the consequences of this issue we must check all the functions inside all normalizers that are related to dataset parameters and check them once again after reaching a conclusion for this issue.

@opsdep opsdep closed this as completed Aug 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant