Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can't achieve mAP as reported in the paper #3

Open
JudeLiu opened this issue Dec 10, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Can't achieve mAP as reported in the paper #3

JudeLiu opened this issue Dec 10, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@JudeLiu
Copy link

JudeLiu commented Dec 10, 2019

I run the code for a several times, the mAP at IOU=0.5 is 25.34%. Then I use exponential lr scheduling, and it increases to 26.06%. But still lower than 26.6% as reported. Can you possibly explain what could be wrong? Thanks in advance.

@naraysa
Copy link
Owner

naraysa commented Dec 10, 2019

Kindly check your Pytorch version and run the code with the default settings. We obtained the reported results with version 0.4.1.

@JudeLiu
Copy link
Author

JudeLiu commented Dec 10, 2019

yes, the pytorch version is 0.4.1. If the code is run with defaults, I get 25.34% detection mAP at 0.5 IOU and 86.06% classification mAP (on THUMOS14). I noticed that the classification mAP and detection mAP both decreased after 30k iterations, which is why I tried learning rate decay.

@naraysa
Copy link
Owner

naraysa commented Dec 10, 2019

Not sure what the problem is, since a few others could obtain the detection mAP around the reported numbers in the paper. We have not used any decay. It is constant lr. Kindly share the generated log file and the command used for the experiment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants