Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updates needed ? #7

Open
simonmichael opened this issue Jan 30, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

updates needed ? #7

simonmichael opened this issue Jan 30, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@simonmichael
Copy link

Hi @narendraj9, thanks for this add-on. We have been gathering add-ons lately, at http://hledger.org/download.html#d and http://hledger.org/hledger.html#add-on-commands and it would be nice to link yours. Would you like to update it for current stackage/GHC, and add setup instructions to the readme ?

I saw your demo (nice bear! :) but adding transactions seemed to have no effect. It seems like your web service might be similar to hledger-api ?

@narendraj9
Copy link
Owner

narendraj9 commented Jan 30, 2017

Hi @simonmichael ,

I will update it when I get time. I am not sure if this really qualifies as an addon. I use this service mainly to just store entries and later fetch them into Emacs with my hledger-mode'. I think it's not comparable to hledger-api' as the latter probably provides all hledger functions as a web service.

Glad that you liked the bear! :)

@simonmichael
Copy link
Author

I use the word pretty loosely, eg for any hledger-related tool with a hledger-* name (which means it shows up in the hledger commands list).

If you ever get around to blogging about your setup, I'm sure that would be very interesting!

@narendraj9
Copy link
Owner

@simonmichael Sure, I will write a blog post about it when I get the time to. I will share it here in this conversation so that you can it read it too :) Thanks! :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants