Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Apply for message content privileged intent #150

Closed
naschorr opened this issue Oct 19, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #174
Closed

Apply for message content privileged intent #150

naschorr opened this issue Oct 19, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #174
Assignees
Labels
discord Pertains to Discord specific issues: API, permissions, intents, etc.

Comments

@naschorr
Copy link
Owner

Hawking uses the textual content of the message alongside it's activation string to generate speech, and since it's now in more than 1,100(!) servers, it'll be crucial to become approved.

Where Hawking needs message content:

  • \say [text] requires message content to determine what speech to generate
  • \find [text] requires message content to know what phrase to search for, otherwise this feature is pointless
  • \admin [subcommand] I believe discord.py pulls in message content for subcommands, but I'm not 100% sure (I can't imagine how else it would work though)

Applications for the intent open at October 25, 2021 3:00 PM.

Discord's policy for this intent: https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/4410940809111
Discord's intent FAQ: https://support-dev.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/4404772028055-Message-Content-Access-Deprecation-for-Verified-Bots.

@naschorr naschorr added the discord Pertains to Discord specific issues: API, permissions, intents, etc. label Oct 19, 2021
@naschorr naschorr self-assigned this Oct 19, 2021
@naschorr
Copy link
Owner Author

See #160

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discord Pertains to Discord specific issues: API, permissions, intents, etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant