Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Measures the number of major, minor, and patch versions between your dependencies' installed and newest versions #12

Open
nasirhjafri opened this issue Dec 30, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@nasirhjafri
Copy link
Owner

Add a new argument --versions to measures the number of major, minor, and patch versions between your dependencies' installed and newest versions

$ libyear --versions
                 activesupport        4.2.7.1     2016-08-10          5.1.3     2017-08-03      [1, 0, 0]
                          i18n          0.8.0     2017-01-31          0.8.6     2017-07-10      [0, 0, 6]
                          json          1.8.6     2017-01-13          2.1.0     2017-04-18      [1, 0, 0]
                      minitest         5.10.1     2016-12-02         5.10.3     2017-07-21      [0, 0, 2]
             minitest_to_rspec          0.6.0     2015-06-09          0.8.0     2017-01-02      [0, 2, 0]
                   ruby_parser          3.8.4     2017-01-13         3.10.1     2017-07-21      [0, 2, 0]
                sexp_processor          4.8.0     2017-02-01         4.10.0     2017-07-17      [0, 2, 0]
                   thread_safe          0.3.5     2015-03-11          0.3.6     2017-02-22      [0, 0, 1]
                        tzinfo          1.2.2     2014-08-08          1.2.3     2017-03-25      [0, 0, 1]
Major, minor, patch versions behind: 2, 6, 10
@nasirhjafri nasirhjafri added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Dec 30, 2019
@miketheman
Copy link
Contributor

miketheman commented Oct 23, 2020

This assumes that packages adhere to SemVer, correct? Python packages often adhere to it, but even PEP440 doesn't require the full version X.Y.Z.

How would you consider reporting on packages that don't adhere to the spec?

(same question applies to #11 )

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants