Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial Zephyr Squad support #7

Open
Steinhagen opened this issue Apr 12, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Initial Zephyr Squad support #7

Steinhagen opened this issue Apr 12, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@Steinhagen
Copy link

It would be nice if this module would also implement some Zephyr Squad functionalities for either server/cloud variants.
https://zephyrsquadserver.docs.apiary.io/#

@nassauwinter
Copy link
Owner

Hello @Steinhagen!

Thank you for the request here 🙂

Are you actually using Zephyr Squad? What exact type? (Server or Cloud?)

There was no plans to implement the wrappers since it seems to be unpopular. But in case I'm wrong about it and there's a demand I can spend some time and create the wrappers gradually.

@Steinhagen
Copy link
Author

There was no plans to implement the wrappers since it seems to be unpopular. But in case I'm wrong about it and there's a demand I can spend some time and create the wrappers gradually.

I agree. The functionality provided by Zephyr Squad are extremely limited if you compare it to ZS, but the main advantage of Squad is that it uses the standard Jira data types. As a result for this, a lot of third party plugins like R4J will completely work out-of-the-box for any project when you are linking requirements to test cases.
I've seen a lot of e2e solutions choosing Squad instead of Scale (despite it's limitations) only to have a fully working complete workflow for all stakeholders (architects, developers and engineers).

@crapitea
Copy link
Contributor

The support for this is partially added by #10 .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants