You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In working on Urban Nature Access, we had a case where we had a large cluster of polygons with boundaries that touched but whose interiors were all distinct. Using the current implementation of calculate_disjoint_polygon_set, there were 8 groupings of polygons. I propose including an optional flag in calculate_disjoint_polygon_set to not consider touching polygons as intersecting.
The scope of work here would be a couple hours to implement, test and PR in.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
phargogh
changed the title
Proposal: optionally allow touching but nonoverlapping polygons in calculate_disjoint_polygon_set
Optionally allow touching but nonoverlapping polygons in calculate_disjoint_polygon_setDec 9, 2022
In working on Urban Nature Access, we had a case where we had a large cluster of polygons with boundaries that touched but whose interiors were all distinct. Using the current implementation of
calculate_disjoint_polygon_set
, there were 8 groupings of polygons. I propose including an optional flag incalculate_disjoint_polygon_set
to not consider touching polygons as intersecting.The scope of work here would be a couple hours to implement, test and PR in.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: