Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clarify nomenclature of access_grants #94

Open
dteycheney opened this issue Sep 12, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Clarify nomenclature of access_grants #94

dteycheney opened this issue Sep 12, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
@smk4664
Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted by the maintainers team for implementation status: help wanted This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation type: documentation

Comments

@dteycheney
Copy link

Environment

  • Python version: 3.8.10
  • Nautobot version: 1.1.2
  • nautobot-chatops version: 1.5.0

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Read the documentation on this page - https://github.com/nautobot/nautobot-plugin-chatops/blob/develop/docs/chat_setup/chat_setup.md#grant-access-to-the-chatbot
  2. Attempt to create some access grants for Cisco Webex Teams

Expected Behavior

I expected to glean from the documentation on how to set this up using Webex Teams constructs.

For example, Webex uses the term room instead of the Slack specific term channel. I'd suggest perhaps having a translation table which shows the correlation between the different nomenclature.

Observed Behavior

Not applicable.
@dteycheney
Copy link
Author

FYI @tim-fiola

@jvanderaa jvanderaa added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed status: accepted This issue has been accepted by the maintainers team for implementation status: help wanted This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation type: documentation and removed help wanted Extra attention is needed documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers labels Sep 16, 2021
@smk4664 smk4664 self-assigned this Nov 10, 2022
@smk4664 smk4664 mentioned this issue Nov 16, 2022
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@smk4664 smk4664

Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted by the maintainers team for implementation status: help wanted This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation type: documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@smk4664 @jvanderaa @dteycheney