Evaluate using dynamic groups inside of AddressObject
#101
Labels
status: action required
This issue requires additional information to be actionable
status: blocked
Another issue or external requirement is preventing implementation
Environment
Proposed Functionality
Allow
AddressObjectGroup
to source its members from a dynamic group. This could for example be a newForeignKey
field on the model pointing toDynamicGroup
.Use Case
All prefixes with the role
user-lan
should have access to a set of services. Instead of manually updating the policy rule (or NAT policy rule) whenever there are changes, we could instead use dynamic groups to automatically accomplish that.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: