-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 253
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Spike: Research Existing Models for Desirable FK, Related Names Changes #2960
Comments
circuits
dcim
extras
ipam
tenancy
users
virtualization
Abstract base class related names
Decided that this isn't worth the effort for now.
|
Drop the attached file in |
The only concern I have are the recommendation for any https://github.com/nautobot/nautobot/blob/develop/nautobot/extras/models/statuses.py#L179 If there's a way we can introspect this easier and have the model's |
Another one is if a |
The |
Having both |
Can't/shouldn't do these - a DeviceBay has both a |
Shouldn't do these since we're collapsing the Role models. |
IMO we shouldn't do this since it'll be one more breaking change we'll have to do/revert as a part of #1178. |
I'd rather leave as-is than try to fix the confusing terminology as part of this spike. There's plenty of work to be done here fixing consistency in field and related names ( |
Looks like this won't be easy. We'd have to overload the |
Let's just align on whatever that should be the interpolated |
We could standardize This would mean we would need to change the follow abstract base classes and keys:
|
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: