Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Getting the point clouds out at the right scale #44

Closed
truncs opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

Getting the point clouds out at the right scale #44

truncs opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@truncs
Copy link

truncs commented Mar 15, 2024

Would it be possible to use spase or dense matchers to get the scale out? Getting all the matched points and then using the known intrinsics to project them into 3d and then comparing the same points to pointmap in dust3r?

@vincent-leroy
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @truncs and thanks for your interest!
Well in general, there is a problem to determine the scale of a scene with photogrammetry methods. Prior information must be leveraged as it cannot be guessed purely from triangulation. If you know the absolute depth of (at least one) view(s), or the scale of an object in the scene, you can use it to correct the output of our method, but this requires manual post-processing and is not part of our default pipeline.
Note that while DUSt3R does not output absolute metric reconstructions, it is theoretically possible to train it to do so, provided the training data is metric. We verified it in our experiments, but an absolute metric DUSt3R is still to be trained and evaluated properly.

@truncs
Copy link
Author

truncs commented Mar 15, 2024

@vincent-leroy Thanks for the prompt reply!
Would it work if get the matched sampled points from stereo images with known baseline?
Are there plans to train a metric DUSt3R and release it?

@vincent-leroy
Copy link
Contributor

I guess it should work if you find the right transformation to align to whatever metric prediction you have.
We plan it for the next release yes

@truncs
Copy link
Author

truncs commented Mar 18, 2024

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants