We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simplify the Spectrogram Separate Node by reusing the Spectrogram Node instead of having having duplicate driver nodes:
Chromagram Separate Node, the same as the Spectrogram Separate Node but with the Chromagram node instead, great for B4.0+ Repeat Zones:
While I'm not actually sure this would make a meaningful difference to performance, but I do think it will reduce complexity of the node files.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Simplify the Spectrogram Separate Node by reusing the Spectrogram Node instead of having having duplicate driver nodes:
![Screenshot_20240122_215059](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/127012288/298801428-61495246-9fad-4f00-a618-1c7dd16bd471.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJnaXRodWIuY29tIiwiYXVkIjoicmF3LmdpdGh1YnVzZXJjb250ZW50LmNvbSIsImtleSI6ImtleTUiLCJleHAiOjE3MjEwODY0NzYsIm5iZiI6MTcyMTA4NjE3NiwicGF0aCI6Ii8xMjcwMTIyODgvMjk4ODAxNDI4LTYxNDk1MjQ2LTlmYWQtNGYwMC1hNjE4LTFjN2RkMTZiZDQ3MS5wbmc_WC1BbXotQWxnb3JpdGhtPUFXUzQtSE1BQy1TSEEyNTYmWC1BbXotQ3JlZGVudGlhbD1BS0lBVkNPRFlMU0E1M1BRSzRaQSUyRjIwMjQwNzE1JTJGdXMtZWFzdC0xJTJGczMlMkZhd3M0X3JlcXVlc3QmWC1BbXotRGF0ZT0yMDI0MDcxNVQyMzI5MzZaJlgtQW16LUV4cGlyZXM9MzAwJlgtQW16LVNpZ25hdHVyZT01M2VmNzAyNWM0MTFjOWJiZDQ4MDQ2OTAwMTJlZDE0NWZjNTBmY2RjZjVhMmIyYjdmYzhkOWRiN2Y1MDM1MDZiJlgtQW16LVNpZ25lZEhlYWRlcnM9aG9zdCZhY3Rvcl9pZD0wJmtleV9pZD0wJnJlcG9faWQ9MCJ9.DcWBCK6ub-QzVBeR1SCfyvkpyTc1Tc7NfXNSb0gU9TI)
Chromagram Separate Node, the same as the Spectrogram Separate Node but with the Chromagram node instead, great for B4.0+ Repeat Zones:
![Screenshot_20240122_214838](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/127012288/298801429-a9eaa9ad-5351-433e-815c-bab280e74b99.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJnaXRodWIuY29tIiwiYXVkIjoicmF3LmdpdGh1YnVzZXJjb250ZW50LmNvbSIsImtleSI6ImtleTUiLCJleHAiOjE3MjEwODY0NzYsIm5iZiI6MTcyMTA4NjE3NiwicGF0aCI6Ii8xMjcwMTIyODgvMjk4ODAxNDI5LWE5ZWFhOWFkLTUzNTEtNDMzZS04MTVjLWJhYjI4MGU3NGI5OS5wbmc_WC1BbXotQWxnb3JpdGhtPUFXUzQtSE1BQy1TSEEyNTYmWC1BbXotQ3JlZGVudGlhbD1BS0lBVkNPRFlMU0E1M1BRSzRaQSUyRjIwMjQwNzE1JTJGdXMtZWFzdC0xJTJGczMlMkZhd3M0X3JlcXVlc3QmWC1BbXotRGF0ZT0yMDI0MDcxNVQyMzI5MzZaJlgtQW16LUV4cGlyZXM9MzAwJlgtQW16LVNpZ25hdHVyZT02MWJiNWUzNDNiMmU4MTA3YTAxNzQ1Mzk5NjAzYmU3MWJmY2M1NzMyZTk3NWFhZDQ2ZmZiNzk5ODFkNDdjMmRkJlgtQW16LVNpZ25lZEhlYWRlcnM9aG9zdCZhY3Rvcl9pZD0wJmtleV9pZD0wJnJlcG9faWQ9MCJ9.gEJDnYDRI5N-Gr7xVfJpbdqNGly5RxTKuOodYdzEnSg)
While I'm not actually sure this would make a meaningful difference to performance, but I do think it will reduce complexity of the node files.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: