Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ReEncryptHeader in headers could accept a dataeditlist to override whatever is currently in the header. #124

Closed
pontus opened this issue Feb 28, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@pontus
Copy link
Contributor

pontus commented Feb 28, 2024

For the use case of sending parts of an encrypted stream in sensitive data archive (e.g. sda-download, neicnordic/sensitive-data-archive#696) it would be useful if headers.ReEncryptHeader accepted the possibility to receive something to replace the current data edit list.

I don't have any strong opinions on what the interface should look like (e.g. varargs, nil for no-replacement or something else).

Theoretically, there should be no need to remove the use of data edit list totally - the single element list [0] should mean the same, but it might be nice to be able to set the header to have no data edit list.

@pontus pontus self-assigned this Feb 28, 2024
@pontus pontus changed the title ReEncryptHeader in headers could accept an dataeditlist to override whatever is currently in the header. ReEncryptHeader in headers could accept a dataeditlist to override whatever is currently in the header. Feb 28, 2024
@pontus
Copy link
Contributor Author

pontus commented May 27, 2024

Solved by #128 .

@pontus pontus closed this as completed May 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant