You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For the use case of sending parts of an encrypted stream in sensitive data archive (e.g. sda-download, neicnordic/sensitive-data-archive#696) it would be useful if headers.ReEncryptHeader accepted the possibility to receive something to replace the current data edit list.
I don't have any strong opinions on what the interface should look like (e.g. varargs, nil for no-replacement or something else).
Theoretically, there should be no need to remove the use of data edit list totally - the single element list [0] should mean the same, but it might be nice to be able to set the header to have no data edit list.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
pontus
changed the title
ReEncryptHeader in headers could accept an dataeditlist to override whatever is currently in the header.
ReEncryptHeader in headers could accept a dataeditlist to override whatever is currently in the header.
Feb 28, 2024
For the use case of sending parts of an encrypted stream in sensitive data archive (e.g. sda-download, neicnordic/sensitive-data-archive#696) it would be useful if
headers.ReEncryptHeader
accepted the possibility to receive something to replace the current data edit list.I don't have any strong opinions on what the interface should look like (e.g. varargs, nil for no-replacement or something else).
Theoretically, there should be no need to remove the use of data edit list totally - the single element list
[0]
should mean the same, but it might be nice to be able to set the header to have no data edit list.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: