-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
/
RelationshipInUseWithCorrectRelationshipTypeCheck.java
66 lines (60 loc) · 2.83 KB
/
RelationshipInUseWithCorrectRelationshipTypeCheck.java
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
/*
* Copyright (c) 2002-2018 "Neo4j,"
* Neo4j Sweden AB [http://neo4j.com]
*
* This file is part of Neo4j.
*
* Neo4j is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
* (at your option) any later version.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
package org.neo4j.consistency.checking.full;
import java.util.Arrays;
import org.neo4j.consistency.checking.CheckerEngine;
import org.neo4j.consistency.checking.ComparativeRecordChecker;
import org.neo4j.consistency.report.ConsistencyReport;
import org.neo4j.consistency.store.RecordAccess;
import org.neo4j.kernel.impl.store.record.AbstractBaseRecord;
import org.neo4j.kernel.impl.store.record.RelationshipRecord;
import static org.neo4j.consistency.checking.full.NodeInUseWithCorrectLabelsCheck.sortAndDeduplicate;
public class RelationshipInUseWithCorrectRelationshipTypeCheck
<RECORD extends AbstractBaseRecord, REPORT extends ConsistencyReport.RelationshipInUseWithCorrectRelationshipTypeReport>
implements ComparativeRecordChecker<RECORD,RelationshipRecord, REPORT>
{
private final long[] indexRelationshipTypes;
public RelationshipInUseWithCorrectRelationshipTypeCheck( long[] expectedEntityTokenIds )
{
this.indexRelationshipTypes = sortAndDeduplicate( expectedEntityTokenIds );
}
@Override
public void checkReference( RECORD record, RelationshipRecord relationshipRecord, CheckerEngine<RECORD,REPORT> engine, RecordAccess records )
{
if ( relationshipRecord.inUse() )
{
// Relationship indexes are always semantically multi-token, which means that the relationship record just need to have one of the possible
// relationship types mentioned by the index. Relationships can't have more than one type anyway.
long type = relationshipRecord.getType();
if ( Arrays.binarySearch( indexRelationshipTypes, type ) < 0 )
{
// The relationship did not have any of the relationship types mentioned by the index.
for ( long indexRelationshipType : indexRelationshipTypes )
{
engine.report().relationshipDoesNotHaveExpectedRelationshipType( relationshipRecord, indexRelationshipType );
}
}
}
else
{
engine.report().relationshipNotInUse( relationshipRecord );
}
}
}