Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignoring a user's chats #48

Open
hftf opened this issue Dec 6, 2012 · 4 comments
Open

Ignoring a user's chats #48

hftf opened this issue Dec 6, 2012 · 4 comments

Comments

@hftf
Copy link

hftf commented Dec 6, 2012

Self-explanatory, analogous to /ignore on IRC

@antimatter15
Copy link
Member

The settings thing is getting a bit overcrowded, so maybe we should start creating additional interactions based on some sort of command line interface. Since "/" is bound to chat, maybe "%".

@frvctl
Copy link
Member

frvctl commented Dec 6, 2012

Start diggin into the command line and all you get are ashes. But really, I think that redesigning the settings area would be far more appropriate. That's not to say that a command line interface wouldn't be good for the power users out there.

@hftf
Copy link
Author

hftf commented Dec 6, 2012

How about put a menu of user actions like "ignore", "send message", etc. in the stats popup you currently have when you hover on a user? Just separate the scoring-related stats (corrects, interrupts) from the others (last seen, id, new actions menu).

@frvctl
Copy link
Member

frvctl commented Dec 6, 2012

Oh right, that's a good idea for this particular case I guess I was being more ambiguous as to adding more settings in general. I think though that the whisper functionality should remain as is, unless we want to create a secondary window area for sustained private conversations. The ignore feature could easily be integrated into that popup though, as far as I know. Perhaps a checkbox in the upper corner of the popout?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants