Tracking Issue of ckb2021

[doitian]

The code name ckb2021 refers to the first CKB upgrade package which is scheduled to be deployed in 2021 via hard fork. This issue tracks the progress of ckb2021.

Proposals

• @xxuejie Draft: CKB VM version 1
• @doitian CKB VM version selection #232 Draft: CKB VM version selection
• @doitian Discussion on header dep immature rule #231 Brainstorm: Discussion on header dep immature rule
• @doitian [HOLD] Allow unknown tx & block version #230 Draft: Allow unknown tx & block version
• @doitian ckb2021: fix load_cell_data_hash syscall #228 Draft: fix load_cell_data_hash syscall
• @doitian RFC31: Add a variable length field in the block header #224 In Review: Add a variable length field in the block header
• @doitian RFC30: Ensure that index is less than length in input since field using epoch. #223 In Review: Since absolute epoch using rational number
• @doitian RFC29: Allow multiple matches on dep cells via type script hash when these cells have the same data #222 In Review: Allow script multiple matches on identical code
• @doitian RFC28: Use Block Timestamp as Start Timestamp in Since #221 In Review: Use Block Timestamp as Start Timestamp in Since
• @doitian [HOLD] User activated soft forks proposal #213 In Review: User activated soft forks proposal breaking change hard-fork

[doitian]

See this project kanban https://github.com/nervosnetwork/rfcs/projects/5