You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In NEST, the size of photo-electron is drawn from a Gaussian with allow negative value for the pulse area of SPE. It needs to be changed by a truncated gaussian to avoid negative values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@riffard , 2093f96 Should have this problem solved now. I did not neglect the 2-PE effect either: both the variables phe1 and phe2 have been changed. Even though I have already pushed to master (after triple-checking however that no ill effects, using LUX Run03 D-D band as test case since NRs are disproportionately affected having the lowest-energy signals of course in S1) please look over and verify that you like my changes, even though I have also closed the issue already now (I can always reopen of course, if need be). I also checked that, sans noiseB[0] and [1] (i.e. both set to 0) and after removal of all phe's of value 0.000 the phe1 (didn't check phe2, but should be identical) distribution has a mean of 1.0000... to very high precision after millions of events. (Trying to tag Aaron M. too, but can't find him as user...)
In NEST, the size of photo-electron is drawn from a Gaussian with allow negative value for the pulse area of SPE. It needs to be changed by a truncated gaussian to avoid negative values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: