Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VLANs in Topoplogy #71

Closed
Narek307 opened this issue Jul 21, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

VLANs in Topoplogy #71

Narek307 opened this issue Jul 21, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
pending closure Requires immediate attention to avoid being closed for inactivity status: revisions needed This issue requires additional information to be actionable type: feature Request for new feature or change to existing feature

Comments

@Narek307
Copy link

First of all thank you for this great plugin.
I would like to if there is way to show VLANs in topology?

@dreng dreng added the type: feature Request for new feature or change to existing feature label Dec 10, 2022
@dreng
Copy link
Collaborator

dreng commented Jan 7, 2023

To the thread opener and all that reacted with a thumbs up: I wonder how you would visualise that. Let's say, we've got a 48-port switch with a hundred tagged and untagged VLANs spread all over the ports. How could this look like?

Like this?
vlans
Or like that?
vlans2

And that's just a small part of all ports and VLANs.

I can only image to somehow integrate the information into the mouseover popup text. But visualising all VLANs seems to be impossible to me.

I'm looking forward to your suggestions.

@dreng dreng added the status: revisions needed This issue requires additional information to be actionable label Jan 7, 2023
@RataDP
Copy link

RataDP commented Jan 10, 2023

As our internal documentation we will like the second option you showed, the tag in the cables. But this is a mess when you have a lot of cables.

This is an example of our diagrams, but if you think with more cables, this is unmanageable.
image

The best approach will be to put the information in the popup, something like:

Cable between
SwitchCore1 [Gi01]
SwitchAccess55 [Gi24]
VLANs: 5U, 11-18T, 20T

@dreng
Copy link
Collaborator

dreng commented Jan 10, 2023

As our internal documentation we will like the second option you showed, the tag in the cables.

The intention of these pictures was to show that it is not a good idea at all.

This is an example of our diagrams, but if you think with more cables, this is unmanageable.

Correct. That doesn't scale at all.

The best approach will be to put the information in the popup, something like:

I don't agree, because this doesn't scale either. You've got a maximum of 4 VLANs in your example, which is not even close to the real world. Besides, a VLAN is never bound to a cable, but to an interface. I think it's a very bad idea to display it differently. No one could tell if the VLANs belong to termination A, B or both. If you remove the cable, there are no VLANs anymore. That's against NetBox' philosophy of reflecting the real world.

@dreng dreng added the pending closure Requires immediate attention to avoid being closed for inactivity label Jan 27, 2023
@dreng dreng closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pending closure Requires immediate attention to avoid being closed for inactivity status: revisions needed This issue requires additional information to be actionable type: feature Request for new feature or change to existing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants