Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Turn off forced GC by default #184

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

jotak
Copy link
Member

@jotak jotak commented Sep 19, 2023

Also rename EnableGC => ForceGC (GC is never disabled)

This should improve CPU usage at the expanse of memory, but memory is supposed to be capped with GOMEMLIMIT (which also triggers GC when reached) so this shouldn't be worrying

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

  • Will this change affect NetObserv / Network Observability operator? If not, you can ignore the rest of this checklist.
  • Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
  • Does this PR require product documentation?
    • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
  • Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
    • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
  • Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
    • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
  • QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
    • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
    • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
    • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

Also rename EnableGC => ForceGC (GC is never disabled)

This should improve CPU usage at the expanse of memory, but memory is
supposed to be capped with GOMEMLIMIT (which also triggers GC when
reached) so this shouldn't be worrying
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 19, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from jotak. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jotak
Copy link
Member Author

jotak commented Sep 19, 2023

/hold

holding for perf tests

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 19, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 75.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (2eae149) 39.51% compared to head (561ef60) 39.51%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #184   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   39.51%   39.51%           
=======================================
  Files          31       31           
  Lines        2394     2394           
=======================================
  Hits          946      946           
  Misses       1391     1391           
  Partials       57       57           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 39.51% <75.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed Coverage Δ
pkg/flow/tracer_ringbuf.go 21.87% <50.00%> (ø)
pkg/flow/tracer_map.go 78.57% <83.33%> (ø)
pkg/agent/agent.go 37.84% <100.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@msherif1234
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@jotak
Copy link
Member Author

jotak commented Sep 20, 2023

closing in favor of #185

@jotak jotak closed this Sep 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants