RFC: Group array values declaration

[mrtnzlml]

• bug report? no
• feature request? yes

Description

I don't think there is super big chance for this feature, but let's try it... :) As you know in PHP it's possible to use group declarations for namespaces. I found it very useful. And now I am missing this syntax in NEON format. Instead of this:

services:
  - Adeira\Connector\Devices\Application\Service\WeatherStation\AddWeatherStationRecordService
  - Adeira\Connector\Devices\Application\Service\WeatherStation\ViewAllWeatherStationsService
  - Adeira\Connector\Devices\Application\Service\WeatherStation\ViewSingleWeatherStationService

It would be awesome to write just this:

services:
  - Adeira\Connector\Devices\Application\Service\WeatherStation\{
      AddWeatherStationRecordService,
      ViewAllWeatherStationsService,
      ViewSingleWeatherStationService
    }

Also it opens new ways of configuring multiple services at once:

services:
  - class: Adeira\Connector\Devices\Application\Service\WeatherStation\{
      AddWeatherStationRecordService,
      ViewAllWeatherStationsService,
      ViewSingleWeatherStationService
    }
    arguments:
      transactionalSession: @doctrineSession
      ownerService: @userIdOwnerService

But I would be ok with just simple group format without possibilities to configure these services. Unfortunately it means that NEON syntax will be more complicated, but it should be without BC break (works only with [a-z]\\{ ...). What do you think? Or maybe it's just stupid idea... :)

This is maby more related to the Nette\DI package, but it's NEON syntax...

[dg]

To modify the syntax of neon there must be a really serious reason, which this is not. But this works:

services:
  - Adeira\Connector\Devices\Application\Service\WeatherStation\(
      AddWeatherStationRecordService,
      ViewAllWeatherStationsService,
      ViewSingleWeatherStationService
    )

So it can be implemented in nette/di, for example as custom NEON loader.

[mrtnzlml]

I wasn't very optimistic and I understand. Thanks for the answer @dg - it's way better than thumb down. I will try to solve it differently, because reading those config files is real pain... :)